GuyF said:
arthurbikemad said:
..I am loving the 500/4ii (got the other week) so much I figure it deserves a decent body, something with a little "punch"...
Yup, same combo I use (I think I may have recommended the lens to you too

). As much as the 5D3 is still a great camera, moving to the 1DX2 is terrific. Poor light? Bang up the ISO and keep shooting!
If you haven't already done so, register your gear with CPS Europe. It's free in Europe and you don't need to be a pro to use the service, just have enough qualifying gear and off you go. One of the benefits is you'll get an extra 1yr warranty for your 1DX2.
I recall looking at the CPS requirements here in Canada and it seems to me you had to produce proof of earning a living with the gear or essentially that. A 1DX II purchase for me would take care of the rest, so anyone please clarify.
I've been going nuts over this 30 MP vs 1DX II 20 MP since I often have to crop quite a lot. I really want the 1DX II if it were not for that. So the question I guess is this, is it likely the difference is not as great as it would seem based on the trade-offs that come with smaller pixel pitch?
Regarding fps the DP review page has a sequence of shots at 14fps, by skipping i.e. 1,3,5 .... you can see what 7 fps would be giving you. You can slide back one frame and say "now would be happy if I missed this". Of course everyone would like more but this helps to evaluate as opposed to speculate.
http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Canon-EOS-1D-X-Mark-II.aspx
Jack