Here are more specifications for the Canon EOS R5

Canon Rumors Guy

EOS-1D X Mark III
CR Pro
Jul 20, 2010
9,559
2,256
Canada
www.canonrumors.com
Here are the more specifications (no video information) for the Canon EOS R5. As for the video features, I think we know just about everything about the Canon EOS R5.
Canon EOS R5 Specifications
With the newly developed effective pixel number of 45 million pixels full-size CMOS sensor high-speed signal readout, high-speed processing of new image engine “DIGIC X”, high performance “RF lens”, the highest resolution performance in EOS series history Achieves both high image quality and high-speed continuous shooting.
● AF performance is improved as “dual pixel CMOS AF II” by high-speed signal readout of the new CMOS sensor and high-speed processing of new image engine. When “Face + Tracking priority AF” is set, the distance measurement area is expanded to a maximum of approximately 100% (vertical) x maximum 100% (horizontal) of the screen. Furthermore, when shooting still images, the AF frame is automatically selected from a maximum of 1053 divided areas.
● Supports the...

Continue reading...
 
Last edited:

AlanF

Stay at home
CR Pro
Aug 16, 2012
10,120
16,169
Low pass filter on a 45 Mpx sensor. Maybe good for some but I so much prefer to ditch the filter as I rarely have problems with Moire and the filter does give image degradation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 11 users

padam

EOS R
Aug 26, 2015
1,274
940
Low pass filter on a 45 Mpx sensor. Maybe good for some but I so much prefer to ditch the filter as I rarely have problems with Moire and the filter does give image degradation.
4k60p and 4k120p would probably look bad without it, it is probably not very strong like with the 1DX III.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 users

TomR

EOS 90D
Jun 9, 2020
135
122
still dont know iso range, and all resolutions for video
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user

Starting out EOS R

EOS R5 - RF24-105mm F4L, RF70-200mm f2.8L
Feb 13, 2020
295
315
Looks great but then again, information overload. Always more fun when its there to look at
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user

blackcoffee17

EOS RP
Sep 17, 2014
791
1,039
Any surprise left for tomorrow? Sometimes i hate leaks because nothing will be left for the announcement day.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user

usern4cr

R5
CR Pro
Sep 2, 2018
1,284
2,160
Kentucky, USA
5.76MDot OLED EVF is very good to hear (or should I say "see"). :)

Was hoping the back LCD was higher res than 2.1 MDots, but I'm sure it'll be OK.

Is there an intervalometer? Man, there better be, for such a high-tech video enabled camera. Of course, it can be added in firmware, but you'd *really* expect it to have one.

What about bracketing abilities? Any chance of "aperture bracketing" as a new feature?

No LivdND or software ND feature mentioned. Hopefully it will be mentioned tomorrow. Will be really sad not to have this.

No night star focusing and tracking ability? Too bad, but I can live without it, and it can be added in firmware update hopefully.

And, what was the "big new thing" for photographers?
 
Last edited:

hunck

I'm New Here
Mar 4, 2020
14
12
Anti-reflection coating not applied. Mmmh, could this be a translation error? Would Canon list features they did NOT apply? Seems strange to me. (notice, European prices have vat included)
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user

padam

EOS R
Aug 26, 2015
1,274
940
Anti-reflection coating not applied. Mmmh, could this be a translation error? Would Canon list features they did NOT apply? Seems strange to me. (notice, European prices have vat included)
Lost in translation, the LCD screen itself is probably exactly the same as on the EOS R.
 

Sharlin

EOS R
CR Pro
Dec 26, 2015
1,408
1,422
Turku, Finland
Flash sync speed when EFCS used is 1/250s. Canon’s first non-1-series full frame to have faster than 1/200s I believe? The R6 also has this.
 

Ralph Conway

I'm New Here
Jan 31, 2020
23
8
"EVF with Approx. 2.1 million dots" ? I guess this does not mean the EVF but the screen or the shoulder display?
EVFs resolution is mentioned as 5.76 million dots.
I see it has been corrected already. Thank you.
 
Last edited: