• The Canon Rumors Forum has officially been shut down as of July 10, 2026.

    All data will be deleted on September 16, 2026.

    the ad free experience will return by July 17, 2026.

Venus Optics launches a Piano White version of Laowa 9mm T2.9 Zero-D Cine (RF mount) & OOOM 25-100mm T2.9 Cine

Anhui China, 20 August 2021 – Venus Optics, the camera lens manufacturer specialized in making unique lenses for photographers and cinematographers, is proud to release the Piano White version of Laowa 9mm T2.9 Zero-D Cine for Canon RF mount and OOOM 25-100mm T2.9 Cine. The Piano White version of these two lenses are priced at USD 649 and USD 6,000 (USD 7,500 for the bundle with 1.4x full-frame expander and 1.33x rear anamorphic adapter) respectively.

Laowa OOOM 25-100mm T2.9 Cine
word-image-1.png

New color, New mount, Same excellent performance

The all-in-one Laowa OOOM 25-100mm T2.9 Cine includes a default Arri PL mount with Canon EF and Sony E mount bayonets for interchange. A Canon RF mount bayonet is exclusively added in the piano-white version of the OOOM lens.
All-in-one versatile zoom lens
The comprehensive 4x zoom lens is a versatile gear fulfilling your filming needs from...

Continue reading...


Canon claims top share of press cameras used at the Olympic Games Tokyo 2020

TOKYO, August 20, 2021—As a Gold Partner (Still Camera and Desktop Printer) of the Tokyo 2020 Games, Canon helped support professional photographers through the establishment of a camera service booth inside the Main Press Center so they were in the best condition possible to capture photos of athletes engaged in high-level competition during the Opening Ceremonies, Closing Ceremonies and competition events of the Tokyo 2020 Games.
Canon is active behind the scenes at a wide variety of sporting events, aiming to achieve “zero downtime” for professional photographers so they are never forced to stop and miss definitive moments of these intense competitions. For decades, the Company has built a reliable reputation and helped support journalists on the front lines through a wide range of services.

In addition to such products as the company’s professional flagship camera, the EOS-1D X Mark III, used by a large number of photographers thanks to its high reliability and ease of use...

Continue reading...

PRO-4000 print head went bad, could it be related to power outage/brown out?

I recently got a dreaded print head error on my PRO-4000 printer. It looks like there is no option but to replace the print head, which I have now ordered.

However, I'm suspicious because my house experienced a "brown-out" due to storms while I was out of town (and shortly after I got back.) For a period of time my wall outlets had about 80 volts coming out of them instead of the proper 110V. I leave the printer on all the time because it seems to be happier that way compared to constantly turning it off and on. So the printer was on when this occurred. But, it's worth noting that I had the printer plugged into a Furman PST-8 surge protector, which it pretty much the best surge protector you can buy. While I'm not 100% sure, I seem to remember that the surge protector wouldn't even turn on when the voltage in the house was low, so it might even have logic to just shut off the power going through it if it senses low voltage.


The print head error happened the very next time I used the printer after the power issues though. Now I'm trying to figure out if the print head damage might have been related to the power issues, or if it just coincidentally happened right at the same time.

What do you guys think? I have heard some people say the print heads only last about two years anyway, and if that's the case, then I guess mine was about due to go out. My main concern is that I usually only print one small thing about every week just to keep the head from clogging up. Maybe I need to print more often to avoid printer head issues in the future?

Ultimately I'm just not sure if I should consider the head failure a result of the power issues, even though I had it plugged into a very good surge protector, or if I should change my printing habits to prolong the life of the new head. Thanks.

Firmware: Canon releases v1.4.0 for the Canon EOS R5

As promised Canon has released a major new firmware update for videographers that use the Canon EOS R5. This update adds external 8K ATOMOS Ninja V+ support via the HDMI port.
Firmware v1.4.0 also adds simultaneous movie recording to both memory card slots and the VPG 400 profile.
Firmware Version 1.4.0 incorporates the following fixes and enhancements:

Adds support for outputting 8K/30p/10-bit video signals for ProRes RAW recording to ATOMOS’s Ninja V+ recorder* via HDMI.
* If you have any questions about ATOMOS products, please contact ATOMOS directly.
* Please note that the recorder may become hot.
Adds support for movie recording when the camera is connected to the CN-E18-80mm T4.4 L IS KAS S or CN-E70-200mm T4.4 L IS KAS S EF cinema lenses.
* Still photography shooting is possible however performance is not guaranteed.
* Movie shooting in vertical position is possible however performance is...

Continue reading...
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user

Canon Warranty Period Glitch???????

I have a dilemma with the "effective" warranty period on Canon Gear that is Pre-ordered on line and am wondering if any of my fellow CR members have any practical experience with warranty claim filing under the following circumstances. When registering any product with Canon USA, on line, you are asked to provide the purchase date, which effectively starts the one year warranty coverage. This is the potential problem. Citing just one of many on line pre-order purchases made this year, I placed a pre-order for the new RF 100mm F2.8 is macro lens on Jun 1, 2021, the first day it was possible to place an order for it. This lens wasn't in stock, needless to say and didn't ship until Aug 15, ten weeks after ordering. Even though your CC is not charged until the lens ships, the included receipt shows purchase date of Jun 1. So, when registering lens on Canon's on line USA site, you are asked for the product's purchase date, not the shipped or received date. Seemingly, in this real world example, I have already used ten weeks of Canon warranty period before I even have possession of the lens. I was surprised that the provided receipt didn't show the same date as CC charge, Aug 15, which seems IMO, the fair and right thing to do. So, my question is, has anyone had any first hand warranty claim experience with Canon under similar circumstances? :unsure: Would Canon deny my warranty if I filed a warranty claim in say, mid July of 2022, even though I've only had the lens for 11 months? Doesn't seem right to me. Interested to see what my fellow CR members think or have experienced. Thinking about the upcoming R3 release and a possible pre-order of same. If, say pre-orders could be placed on Sept 15, 2021 but excessive volume of orders caused the camera to be unavailable for shipment until say, Feb 2022, ( a potentially realistic scenario, given current backlog on most pre-orders), do I then have only 7 mos of real warranty remaining on a camera body that I didn't receive until five months later??

Gitzo Legende Tripod GK1545T-RTI Review -Indiegogo

I received my Gitzo GK1545T-RTI Legende Tripod earlier today and wanted to post a quick review, both on the tripod and the crowdfunding experience. I hope this will help others in making future decisions involving Gitzo and/or Indiegogo....

Like many others, when I first heard about this project, I was skeptical. After all, why would Gitzo, a long-standing and reputable company, resort to crowdfunding in order to fund their project... Despite my doubts, I decided to go participate...

Photo related to this review can be found here.

Why I chose to take part in the campaign...

I loved my GT1541T for years before upgrading to my current GT1545T tripod, which I have grown to love even more. I shoot mostly landscapes, so having a reliable, lightweight and compact tripod which I could practically fit into (or alongside) most backpacks was very important to me. Having the GT1545T allowed this and set quite a high standard for my future tripod decisions. For reference, I currently have an R5 (previous a 5DIV) and the GT1545T easily holds 60+ second exposure shots with either body with my 70-200 2.8 II mounted...without any stability concerns.

FYI: I have tried RRS Tripods and the new Peak Design Carbon Fiber Tripods but have preferred the Gitzo designs/usability/price over both brands.

My issue...was that I never loved a compact ballhead. I loved the Markins Q3i but wanted something a bit smaller. I then moved onto the RRS BH-30 which was compact, but the elongated design on the main knob which commonly hits the botton of the plate, was very frustrating. (A silly design which could have been easily remedied by using a basic round knob instead of the elongated one.) The current Gitzo head (GH1382QD) , which is designed for their Series 1 Traveler Tripods, is solid choice but the price on its own ($200 used, $350 new) is not worth it in my opinion, especially when you can get the combo (which includes the GT1545T Tripod) for about $600 new or $500 used. I understood that the Legende Tripod was essentially a special edition of the 1545T but I was intrigued by the new design of the ballhead and decided to go for it.

The price of the "perk" via Indiegogo was $519 for the Tripod which included the ballhead and is almost $100 less than the current GT1545T Combo. Gitzo's resale value also holds pretty well, so I can easily resell my current set up for more (or at least) than the $519 I spent on the perk. (I ended up getting the combo which included the Legende Tripod and Mini Tripod for $619 - For reference, the Mini Tripod retails for $200)

Tripod Review...

The tripod, when compared to my current GT1545T legs, seems very solid. Below are some differences that were immediately noticeable:
  • The tripod legs seem to be the same with a few asthetic differences, such as the silver leg joints replacing the 1545T's rubber joints. (i actually prefer the rubber joints, but usage over time may change my opinion)
  • Both tripods are the same length folded (even with the legs reversed) but the Legende extends about 1-2" higher than the GT1545 when fully extended.
  • The Legende's leg position switches are similar to the older GT1541T switches. (I don't have a preference between the two styles...)
  • The metal used in the Main Hub (which connects the three legs) are different: The Legende's hub is sleeker black metal which the GT1545T's is textured and appears thicker
  • The GT1545T's Main Hub, has an accessory hole which is very useful. (I use a carabiner hook on there and attach it in various ways to my backpacks). The Legende does NOT have this hole.
  • The Legende Tripod includes a numbered planning plate
  • The Legende Tripod comes with an updated screw-in hook included with the tripod.
The new ballhead also seems very promising. Below are my initial observations:
  • Solid construction.
  • Allows for the Legende's legs to be reverse-folded around it, reducing overall bulk of the combo
  • The arca swiss design clamp (when locking screw removed) holds all of my plates, including my peak design capture clip plate
  • The main knob is large and contains a friction knob in the middle
  • All knobs move fluidly
  • Concern: There doesn't seem to be locking mechanisms for the panning and friction knobs, so turning too far the opposite way, will cause that knob to come off?! This should have been as easy design fix, especially for this calibre of tripod
  • Concern: Friction knob could be a bit smaller... it is large and can easily be inadvertently moved when operating the main knob
Overall I am happy I decided to be a part of the campaign. I never needed service on either of my previous Gitzo tripods and I hope for the same with the Legende. One of the Legende's big selling points is its lifetime warranty...which hopefully I will never need to use...but if I do, I hope the process is as easy as advertised. Only time will tell.

Now as far as the campaign itself...

As mentioned above, Gitzo's announcement of this campaign was met with concerns from many. Those concerns were later supported as Gitzo's communication throughout the initial portion of campaign was sub-par. Gitzo's updates on the Indiegogo Site were far and few. Many backers submitted questions only to receive a generic response which did not address their concerns. Backers were frustrated at Gitzo's non-responsiveness, understandably since many had already contributed $500-$700.

Skepticism peaked when some early recipients reported that their tripods had arrived scuffed and scratched as if they were second-hand items. Comments and photos confirming these reports fueled the fire. It wasn't until then that Gitzo, in my opinion, stepped up. To many contributors' disappointment, Gitzo announced that it found that the cause of the damaged tripods was inadequate packaging, and sought to redesign the delivery packaging. This task...would delay delivery of the tripod by a few months! So...the tripod, which was originally scheduled to be delivered in May and June, would now be delivered by the end of August. As expected, many backers were disappointed with the delay.

Gitzo followed up with informative videos, showing contributors the packaging error, and how they planned to remedy it. They continued with more videos and photos, updating backers regularly for the remainder of campaign. I, personally, appreciated Gitzo's transparency and that they owned up to a mistake and corrected it, before it potentially became a bigger problem. As with any business, mistakes/errors will happen and that is understandable...but it is how the business responds will probably be how consumers will remember their experience.

My tripods (Legende and Mini) arrived packed extremely well, first in a larger 26" box, which contained a 24" box which contained the 21" Legende tripod box and the 10" Mini Tripod box. . The Legende was then packed very well within its own box. There was lots of packing materials throughout the package. I would think it would be extremely unlikely that damage could occur within all of these layers of protection.

Both tripod were in excellent condition with absolutely NO signs of use. NO scratches, NO scuffs, NO dents.

Again, overall I am very happy that I chose to take part and remain in the campaign. Some lessons learned, but in the end, I have a great tripod, that will hopefully last for a long time.
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user

EOS R5 Firmware v1.4.0 Released

v1.4.0 for the R5 has been released - available on the UK site, but US and other regions should follow shortly:
https://www.canon.co.uk/support/con...cameras/digital_slr/eos-r5.html?type=firmware

This should help the issue with IS not kicking in immediately (see #7 below), which I've been looking forward to.

Description​

Firmware Version 1.4.0 incorporates the following fixes and enhancements:
1. Adds support for outputting 8K/30p/10-bit video signals for ProRes RAW recording to ATOMOS's Ninja V+ recorder* via HDMI.
* If you have any questions about ATOMOS products, please contact ATOMOS directly.
* Please note that the recorder may become hot.
2. Adds support for movie recording when the camera is connected to the CN-E18-80mm T4.4 L IS KAS S or CN-E70-200mm T4.4 L IS KAS S EF cinema lenses.
* Still photography shooting is possible however performance is not guaranteed.
* Movie shooting in vertical position is possible however performance is not guaranteed.
* External power supply is required for AF operation during servo zoom operation. When there is no external power supply, AF operation is activated only when the servo zoom is not in use.
3. Adds simultaneous movie recording capability on card 1 and card 2, however RAW movies and RAW(Light) movies cannot be recorded simultaneously on card 1 and card 2.
4. Adds support for the VPG 400 (Video Performance Guarantee Profile), a standard based on the CFexpress 2.0 specification.
5. Improves operation stability when using the RF400mm F2.8 L IS USM and RF600mm F4 L IS USM.
6. Fixes an issue in which, during HDMI connection, if the camera's screen turns off, a zebra pattern is displayed via the HDMI output.
7. Fixes an issue in which sufficient image stabilization effects may not be attained immediately after the start of shooting.

Firmware Version 1.4.0 is for cameras with firmware up to Version 1.3.1. If the camera's firmware is already Version 1.4.0, it is not necessary to update the firmware.

TEAC announces the development of TASCAM XLR audio adapter for Canon mirrorless cameras and others

TEAC Corporation is proud to announce the development of the TASCAM CA-XLR2d professional audio XLR microphone adapter for mirrorless cameras. This product is targeted for worldwide release by the end of 2021.
The CA-XLR2d lineup is a collaboration between TEAC Corporation working independently with Canon Inc., FUJIFILM Corporation, and Nikon Corporation. The strategy is to combine the leading camera manufacturers’ know-how, and the high-quality audio capturing technology from TASCAM.
Key Features

Microphone adapter to add a professional audio XLR input to mirrorless cameras
Direct digital audio transmission via a digitized accessory shoe with a built-in AD converter (only compatible for products from Canon and Fujifilm)
Power is supplied by the Camera using the data transmission shoe (only compatible with products from Canon and Fujifilm)
Build-in high-performance TASCAM HDDA (High Definition Discrete Architecture) mic-preamplifier achieves high-quality audio, low noise, wide...

Continue reading...

High megapixel body speculations and wishes

I'm interested to see what CR members think:
Will the next high megapixel camera come in a form of a R5s, R3s or maybe R1?

Would you like to see it with an integrated vertical grip or would you like it to come come in a form of a smaller "R5-like" body?


Personally I would buy both. A faster high res camera with integrated grip, more battery power, fast and reliable wifi and a smaller, lighter camera for backup and hiking.
I shoot commercial work where vertical grip and more speed allways comes in handy.
And I also shoot a lot of landscapes in remote spots where a smaller lighter camera is most welcome even if it lacks some other features.
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user

Review: Canon RF 14-35mm f/4L IS USM

Bryan at The-Digital-Picture has completed his full review of the Canon RF 14-35mm f/4L IS USM which was announced this past June and will begin shipping in limited quantities this month.
From The-Digital-Picture
The first question on my comparison list was: How does the Canon RF 14-35mm F4 L IS USM Lens compare to the RF 15-35mm F2.8 L IS USM Lens?
… In the image quality comparison equalized at f/4, the two lenses are similar overall, with each having some advantages at specific focal lengths. The f/4 lens has dramatically stronger geometric distortion and has stronger lateral CA. The f/2.8 has stronger peripheral shading in most equalized comparisons.
… As I said at the beginning of the review, the...

Continue reading...


Canon RF 14-35 f/4L just reviewed by TDP


Well, the lens is not as ideal as I hoped for (barrel distortion at the wide end, less than ideal sharpness at the long end, color fringing, focus breathing, not parfocal), but I'm buying it anyway.

RF 100mm F2.8 L is macro now shipping??

Pre-ordered my RF 100 macro lens from B&H on Jun 1, 2021. Rec'd notification from BH on Aug 15 that my lens was shipping with expedited shipping ETA of Wed Aug 18. Can we assume backlog of orders is finally catching up?? Do hope so. Four wks after this order, I pre-ordered the new RF 14-35 F4Lis zoom. When I get a shipping notice for this transaction, I'll then know that product availability is getting better. Good luck with your Canon orders, wherever you placed them. As an FYI, my CC was not charged until Aug 15 but it should be noted my CC was charged for tripod collar as well, even though it remains on backorder. Lesson learned. Order accessories separately.

UPDATE: Good news....Lens arrived today Aug 17, one day early.

The Canon EOS R3 will eliminate “Lag” and “Blackout” for stills shooters

There is very little new information coming around about the Canon EOS R3, the last being the confirmation of the 24mp resolution sensor.
A small bit of information I did recently receive was about the blackout and/or lag that is present in the Canon EOS R5 and Canon EOS R6 EVF when shooting still images. It’s not a huge deal for a lot of shooters, but I have seen various critiques about the lag present in the Canon EOS R5 being a bit annoying in certain shooting situations.
I have been told that the Canon EOS R3 will not experience any issues with blackout and/or lag. The new image sensor in the Canon EOS R3 likely has a much faster...

Continue reading...
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user

Problems with Canon USA Store

Seeing that the Canon USA Store finally has all three items I’ve been wanting to purchase in stock at the same time, last night I finally ordered them. a
After paying through paypal, my sales confirmation then states one of the items was on back order.

Then, I received my sales confirmation email stating that the three item are in stock.

I called the Canon USA store phone number to get an accurate confirmation. Their automated system informed me that all three items are on back order. Following their automated prompt, I requested to speak to a representative. i listened to their hold music for30 minutes when my wife suggested contacting paypal to see if this transaction can be cancelled. It cannot.
I’m now back on hold hell with Canon. While I’ve read some Canon USA Store horror stories on these forums, I had no issues with them in the pre-pandemic past.
Until this week, one of these lenses has not been in stock for over 6 months. Now I’ve got sizable chunk of money tied up in a transaction that I have doubts will be completed this year. I have doubts I’ll even get a live person on the phone.
I feel I have no recourse, and am wondering if any of the forum members have found a solution to any similar experiences.

R6 video af setup suggestion

Hey guys,

I'm interested in knowing whether there is any work around to be able to switch to video mode without starting AF instantly, but being able to start AF during the recording without going back to the menu (to enable continous af from the menu).
If continous af is disabled, I can switch from photo mode to video without worrying that the R6 would misfocus just before recording starts. On the other hand, I have not found a way, to engage continous af when needed, once recording has started with continous af set to "disable" in the menu.

Being able to start video recording with no AF enabled, but then having the option to engage it during the recording would make lot of sense in my wildlife videography.

How do you guys work around this issue?

Thanks in advance.

Regards,
Adam

R6 AF setup for video

Hey guys,

I'm interested in knowing whether there is any work around to be able to switch to video mode without starting AF instantly, but being able to start AF during the recording without going back to the menu (to enable continous af from the menu).
If continous af is disabled, I can switch from photo mode to video without worrying that the R6 would misfocus just before recording starts. On the other hand, I have not found a way, to engage af when needed, once recording has started with continous af disabled.

Being able to start video recording with no AF enabled, but then having the option to engage it during the recording would make lot of sense in my wildlife videography.

How do you guys work around this issue?

Thanks in advance.

Regards,
Adam

Patent: A new mirrorless camera body design with integrated grip with pass-through

Here is an interesting patent application showcasing what appears to be new design and functionality of an integrated grip mirrorless camera body. At this time, there’s no way to really know if this design is in fact one Canon is moving forward with on a camera body such as an EOS R1, or if it’s just part of the design process.
Japan Patent JP,2021-117300,A  mostly deals with a secure grip for both horizontal and vertical shooting.
This design is quite unique in that there is an open cavity in the body that your fingers can grip through as you can see in the patent illustration below.


This is definitely some out-of-the-box thinking when it comes to...

Continue reading...
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users

Patent: Canon RF 100-400mm f/5-7.1 IS USM

I have reported many times about a small and affordable Canon RF 100-400mm zoom lens, and another patent for such an optical formula has appeared.
Canon RF 100-400mm f/5-7.1 IS USM

Focal length: 103.00mm 200.00mm 388.50mm
F-number: 5.00 6.26 7.10
Half angle of view: 11.86° 6.17° 3.19°
Image height: 21.64mm 21.64mm 21.64mm
Lens overall length: 215.58mm 255.38mm 293.58mm
Backfocus: 38.40mm 58.61mm 78.01mm

This lens has been on our RF lens roadmap for quite some time, but is listed as an RF 100-400mm f/5.6-7.1 IS USM. It will obviously be small, lightweight, and quite affordable when compared to the RF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1L IS USM
An RF 100-400mm lens has also appeared internally at...


[url=https://www.canonrumors.com/patent-canon-rf-100-400mm-f-5-7-1-is-usm/]Continue reading...

Patent: Optical formulas for an RF 28mm f/1.4 and RF 35mm f/1.4

Canon Inc. has filed a patent application for more optical formulas of fast RF prime lenses, this time an RF 28mm f/1.4L USM and an RF 35mm f/1.4L USM.
There have been many patents in the past for these optical formulas, but our roadmap shows an RF 35mm f/1.2L USM and I haven’t yet been told that an RF 28mm f/1.4L USM was on the way.
Canon RF 28mm f/1.4L USM
Focal length: 26.79mm
F-number: 1.44
Half angle of view: 38.93°
Image height: 21.64mm
Lens overall length: 134.78mm
Backfocus: 13.00mm
Canon RF 35mm f/1.4L USM
Focal length: 33.73mm
F-number: 1.44
Half angle of view: 32.68°
Image height: 21.64mm
Lens overall length: 143.92mm
Backfocus: 20.00mm

Continue reading...

6D vs. R6 vs. M50

I'm a little stuck, but it's a 1st world problem so no biggie.
I do stationary video indoors for YouTube using my original 6D and 24mm 2.8 IS.
If you get a chance - what's your thoughts on just sticking with that, swap out everything for an R6 (would use my 24 + adapter, for now, and try 4K) or an M50/Sigma 16mm (just to have a dedicated video camera)?
Many thanks.
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user

The specifications for the upcoming Nikon Z 9 leak out ahead of the official announcement

Nikon is readying what can be assumed is their flagship professional mirrorless camera, the Nikon Z 9. An announcement for this camera is expected some time in the next couple of months.
It looks like Nikon is going in a very different direction than Sony’s flagship Alpha 1, and Canon’s EOS R3. The EOS R3 is NOT going to be Canon’s flagship mirrorless camera, as I expect we’ll hear more about the Canon EOS R1 later in 2022.
The Nikon Z 9 was in use at the Tokyo Olympics, but it looks like all EXIF data had been scrubbed from any images taken with the camera. This camera looks to be a true flagship professional mirrorless camera, over the toy that is the Sony Alpha 1.
Nikon released a lackluster flagship DSLR in the Nikon D6, which didn’t offer much in the way of advancement from the previous Nikon D5. It looks like they put a lot of R&D dollars in the new Nikon Z 9 and other Z mount...

Continue reading...


Peter McKinnon shows off the Canon EOS R3

Peter McKinnon has posted a video showing a couple of Canon EOS R3’s in his possession. He is not allowed to post and videos or photographs taken from the camera as of yet, but he does give a rundown of some of the features and size comparisons between the EOS R3 and EOS-1D X Mark III and EOS R5.
There’s a cringeworthy Squarespace plug in the middle of the video, but other than that, it should give you a bit of insight into the R3 and how it may handle.

Continue reading...
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user

R5 tilted screen issue

Hi,

I've recently bought R5. In my copy when the screen is closed like on the image below it's not stiff and easily tilts up and down when pushed a little from the bottom.

It's hard to describe so I've created an image that describes the issue.

I've checked 2 other copies of R5 and none of them exhibits this problem, I also have R6 and it also has no issue.

The shop claims it's normal, but sent it for repair.
Authorized service inspected the camera, and "repaired it" with no positive results. Screen is still tilted.

Do you have a similar thing with the screen on your R5?

Thank you for your help.

r5 screen issue.png

Filter

Forum statistics

Threads
37,480
Messages
975,426
Members
24,816
Latest member
GLBDD

Gallery statistics

Categories
1
Albums
29
Uploaded media
372
Embedded media
1
Comments
25
Disk usage
1 GB