If half of this is coming then I will be buying
Upvote
0
Highly detailed shots of walls, documenting cracks in stoneworkIn what area of photography is 45MP considered low? Are you trying to make wall sized prints or what.
I am a boomer, but it was never a case of "IF" but "WHEN". I could care less if it has a mirror or not, I want the capabilities.About time canon
2020 is gonna be a good year
and for the boomers that don’tthink mirrorless is the future well...
8K timelapse? Party like it's 2015, Canon! (Sony A7Rii, 42 MP "raw timelapse" capable...)The 8K I'm tempted to think could be time lapse as a few have already mentioned. A cropped 4K on this camera would be almost unusable at 1:1. The 30MP Eos R and 5D4 have a 4K crop factor of 1.75x already. We're talking about way more here. That said the 4K120 is really a head scratcher. The Sony A7R4 is listed at 62.5MP and can yield 4K30. 48MP with 4K60 seems plausible. but 120?? Wow if true, but I'm struggling to believe that... But the touch bar bit? yeah, that was a big deal for EOS R people because no one seemed to like it. Makes sense to throw that out as a primary mention
Yeah, but in stills mode, the 1DX3 also does "only" 20 FPS, yet this camera is claiming 20 FPS @ 45MP with electronic shutter.The 1DX III does ~ 5500*2900*60 Pixel/second in its RAW video mode, which has no AF.
That's basically the same throughput as 8K 30p RAW video, 4K 120p video and 45 MP 20 FPS stills. So technically it actually sounds plausible - this should all be without AF though! And the 4K options will get a brutal crop or have line skipping. Nonetheless, gorgeous specs. I'm hyped, let's hope this Info will actually transform into reality.
That's the same way my Olympus handles it. The point is (that I was making) that any lens will work... including EF and non-reporting lenses.IBIS *IS* lens dependent in that it needs communication to figure out the focal length, especially with zooms. The image compensation is exaggerated with longer FLs and minimized proportionately with shorter FLs due to parallax effect. Sony and Panasonic handle this somewhat elegantly with non-reporting lenses by having a little menu place where you can manually enter in your current focal length. (Probably a mistake to have put the words elegant, Sony and menu system all together in the same sentence. It takes me 10 minutes to find it every time.) This also enables pixel-shift functions with those lenses. This isn't a guarantee Canon will do same, but the territory is well trod.
Electronic shutter will suffer from rolling shutter effect on moving subjects. A compromise that they would never allow on their fabulous flagship body, I think.Yeah, but in stills mode, the 1DX3 also does "only" 20 FPS, yet this camera is claiming 20 FPS @ 45MP with electronic shutter.
So, it begs the question, did they limit the 1DX3's stills throughput, when it could possibly do 30 FPS or 40 FPS RAW stills, without AF?
I suspect that there is a lot more to these exciting numbers than we're getting. It's very likely that each spec has one or two serious caveats that totally changes the "shock factor" of each number at first glance...
Just Timelapses? With very good DR and lowlight capabilities? Need MF (with an EF adapter)? Sony maybe? Need LR presets for free because of Sony's color science?.. Switch or wait!...View attachment 188382
Just please let it have good DR and low light capabilities! As a timelapser, this camera would be an absolute dream come true!
Flagship DSLR in any case. An OVF alone is probably sufficient to make a lot of people choose a 1DX III over anything Canon will release for RF system soon.But if this rumour is true. Whats the point with the 1 dx mk 3? Isn´t the 1dx mk 3 supposed to be their flag ship in a way.
Yeah, don't know why anyone thinks this is "boomer" mentality. Kinda silly.I am a boomer, but it was never a case of "IF" but "WHEN". I could care less if it has a mirror or not, I want the capabilities.
8K timelapse? Party like it's 2015, Canon! (Sony A7Rii, 42 MP "raw timelapse" capable...)
I'm suspecting that any 4K video better than 30p MP4 is indeed going to be cropped.
4K 30p, both full-sensor and RAW, would already be unprecedented. It would totally steal the thunder from Nikon's 4K RAW external recording, and would put Sony's long reign of un-cropped full-frame 4K video to shame...