can you record raw on 4K?
8K Raw is too much for my needs.
8K Raw is too much for my needs.
Upvote
0
Do we have any idea of when the R5 will start shipping ?
can you record raw on 4K?
8K Raw is too much for my needs.
8k*30fps = 4*4k*30fps = 4k*120fps [confirmed]
the same way:
4k*120fps = 4*2k*120fps = 2k*480fps
If on paper the sensor is able to do 480fps, it should able to do it in reality.
Though now all I hope for is adequate rolling shutter speed
Not disputing the merits of your overall argument but I think the touch sensitive joystick is task specific for IDX type sports shooters using OVF DSLR's. I don't know how many mirrorless users are working the joystick the same way as those single AF point sport shooters. Sure it's a sexy gizmo but in reality smart AI auto-focus with Eye AF and subject tracking are what mirror-less shooter want. Even with the touch joystick shooting that way is thumb killer. Apples and oranges IMO.Another example is the fact that the R5 does not have the touch sensitive AF button from the 1DX3; sure a few users complained but everyone kind of understands that hardware feature is probably expensive and would have driven up the costs of the R5 to unacceptable levels. IMO wanting to get the full capabilities out of the HW that you paid for and that other vendors are offering is not an unreasonable expectation and when that expectation is not met then I consider the HW crippled via the SW.
Those are equivalent data rates but that ignores that that the shutter has to keep up to that data. I don't think it works that way even if you bin and only read every 16th pixel in 2K. Maybe if you cropped to a sixteenth of the sensor but that won't be a popular decision.8k*30fps = 4*4k*30fps = 4k*120fps [confirmed]
the same way:
4k*120fps = 4*2k*120fps = 2k*480fps
If on paper the sensor is able to do 480fps, it should able to do it in reality.
Though now all I hope for is adequate rolling shutter speed
Those are equivalent data rates but that ignores that that the shutter has to keep up to that data. I don't think it works that way even if you bin and only read every 16th pixel in 2K. Maybe if you cropped to a sixteenth of the sensor but that won't be a popular decision.
Yes the electronic rolling shutter. It takes a finite amount of time to sequentially read the sensor. In the case of the R5 that's probably about 1/30th of a second in 8k and 120th in 4k. hopefully it's a bit faster than that to reduce ERS distortion but I wouldn't count on it. Many are assuming that it's not reading all of the pixels at 120th in 4K but we don't know that yet.Shutter? Pretty sure when in video, there's no shutter other than e-shutter used to read the sensor at given intervals.
Maybe the metal lens mount can help. It's quite big and it even continues to the lens (or the adapter)We’ve seen every side of this camera except the bottom. Could that be where the secret to keeping it from overheating is?
Video itself doesn't. The particular hardware tricks that make a camera better for video, but worse for stills, do.I'm sitting here confused and wondering how stills are compromised by video functions?
On or off, you still need to budget for it in your camera design. And that includes not only BoM costs, but power consumption (and dissipation) as well.but i don't see how it "breaks" any photo related features, you either turn DGO on or off - if it does have it.
IMO people are getting carried away thinking it's DGO - and already writing cheques based upon it.
Do you realize that this half-announced camera has already lost its projected "video resale value" - with the H.266 codec specification released yesterday?As far as affecting resale value, of course additional video features will help resale value because the used camera will appeal to a larger user (of course, that is WHY Canon includes video features is the cameras in the first place...)
Do you realize that this half-announced camera has already lost its projected "video resale value" - with the H.266 codec specification released yesterday?
H.265 is that R5 is using, according to Canon.this is a pretty hilarious declaration
h265 has been around since 2013 and still not the standard.
H.265 is that R5 is using, according to Canon.
How so?Video itself doesn't. The particular hardware tricks that make a camera better for video, but worse for stills, do.
You can read up it here. It's still speculation, but at least it doesn't contradict common sense and basic physics, unlike the claims that a camera uses dual-pixel architecture for both dual-gain acquisition and autofocus at the same time, and that reading a half-pixel for exposure will lead to increased DR.Can you provide a source for your info please? It seems to be pretty different from anything I have seen yet and I am curious if you are basing it on speculation or if there's a place where one could read up in what you are saying.
Edit: to clarify, I am specifically talking about the statements about DGO. The parts where it involves two ADCs and amplifiers as well as that it generates heat (to a degree that that's worth mentioning. Obviously electronics do it to some level).
Please reread the posts you are replying to. I don't see how repeating the arguments again and again would be helpful if you don't read them.How so?
But AF and DGO seemingly don't need to happen at the same time. Did somebody suggest otherwise? I was under the impression that Canon uses separate sensor reads to get DPAF and image data. Since they clearly can switch DGO off (see higher frame rates), DPAF can work as usual and DGO be applied to the image frames.You can read up it here. It's still speculation, but at least it doesn't contradict common sense and basic physics, unlike the claims that a camera uses dual-pixel architecture for both dual-gain acquisition and autofocus at the same time, and that reading a half-pixel for exposure will lead to increased DR.