TW said:Well said. I agree completely. But you left out the 50 Macro. ;D
I've also left out all zooms permanently glued down at the 50mm FL.
I can't win.
Upvote
0
TW said:Well said. I agree completely. But you left out the 50 Macro. ;D
rbr said:If Canon comes out with a 50 prime in the same series or quality as the 24/28/35 IS lenses they'll have my money too. That seems to be be the lens that everyone is hoping for right now.
ahsanford said:I think that in this very popular focal length, Canon can offer more price points because I think they are aimed at different users with different needs.
...
Let's assume for a moment they did this, and they made an Otus/Sigma Art killer with IS. It would be comically expensive, long and massive. 100% of existing 50L users would be interested in it, but only 10-20% of the 50 f/1.4 crowd would have the coin and desire to go for such an overpowered tool. In short, I think Canon would be leaving a lot of money on the table with the middle group, who want a solid, reliable prime they can count on.
rbr said:If Canon comes out with a 50 prime in the same series or quality as the 24/28/35 IS lenses they'll have my money too. That seems to be be the lens that everyone is hoping for right now.
Mr_Canuck said:I just don't get why they can put IS in their cheapest EFS18-55 but it's such a feat to put it in primes. I think Canon has been knocking the ball out of the park on image quality with most of their recent releases. No reason this simple formula can't rock. If it's good at 1.8 like the newer Nikon version, I'm all in.
http://www.usa.canon.com/cusa/consumer/standard_display/Lens_Advantage_Perf#usmAdelino said:What exactly is an STM drive (thanks in advance for any replies)?
This is obviously a replacement for the current budget 50mm f/1.8, so to expect IS in such a lens is unrealistic. I'd hazard a guess that a replacement for the f/1.4 would include IS, but we have no idea when such a replacement might appear.I agree with others that a 50 really should have IS. Seems as if there would be room for a 50 that is a bit nicer than the nifty fifty (I do have it and would upgrade) and an artsy 1.4.
ahsanford said:TW said:Well said. I agree completely. But you left out the 50 Macro. ;D
I've also left out all zooms permanently glued down at the 50mm FL.
I can't win.![]()
GaryJ said:Mr Canon seems to be spending his Billions buying companies rather than developing lenses for the loss making DSLR market ,or so it seems to me,reckon we will be slowly left behind. :-\
Lee Jay said:50mm?
About as interesting as reading the tax code.