If the specs posted by Adorama came from Canon, it would be clear what was meant. But it seems pretty obvious they didn't. Canon never stated anything about the dual gain of the R5's sensor, that came from analysis of the output.
I just noticed that the texture patterns on the R1 and R3 bear a remarkable resemblance to those on my wife's and my bed pillows. Mine matches the R3, so the R1 will definitely be an upgrade.
With the upgrade, you both can enjoy an even more robust experience textured for satisfaction.
I have no doubt that there are some users that adapt older lenses but what would you estimate the % of total users doing this would be?
A small percentage, sure. But small enough for Canon to sell a camera that locks them out? I'm less certain.
The context was related to the post linking a mechanical protective shutter for when lenses are taken off but I commented that I wasn't sure how this works for sensor cleaning...
From the patent, I assume it closes the mechanical sensor cover as it is triggered by the mechanical removal of the lens ie independent of any electonic connections. It wouldn't help with sensor cleaning option if the trigger is only mechanical.
Right, because the solution the patent describes is mechanical, as EOS 4 LIFE was saying they'd prefer. Your comment, that the number of lenses requiring this sort of solution was small, would imply that a mechanical solution (as in the patent) is unnecessary.
I think 30mp is perfect for the type of settings this camera is targeting: mainly, events and reportage. Basically a crazy sharp image with a tiny bit of room to crop (the latter of which you don’t really get much of with the R3’s 20mp), but not so big that the file size paired with the insane volume would bog the post process down too bad.
My R8 has the "delete all images in this set?" option to delete everything in a burst. It would be nice if you can easily protect the images you want to keep, kinda like the iPhone has for bursts. Maybe the 'rate' button will finally have a use for me
