I have really enjoyed 35mm SLR's back to developing BW film, prints etc years back and a Ricoh XR2S in 80's with several lens. Fortunately the Tri-x film from 5 weeks in South America was separated in other luggage before my kit was stolen by a cab driver. I never replaced it with any SLR until an Cann Elan model in the 90's I had for business product photos, great and reliable. Convenience to me is key. I had several camcorders that were great, then the first pocket 110 Elph, and other Canon compacts, the first iPhone 3, it was convenient but low res and after that a number of smartphones all decent snapshots and videos but they all sucked for telephoto or macro. I loved Canon's products and still do. I owned a iPhone 7 a few years ago with great "Live" merged photos and panorama stitching on a long 3 month trip and shot 10,000 photos with it, all were really nice quality images and sent to immediate backup to the iCloud. How convenient to have the iCloud, as it was stolen near end of my trip. The idea of instant photos with a phone cannot be compared to most users to an extent. But Smartphones then had no macro or telephoto like a larger DSLR or MILC would give me. I will never buy anymore Apple products like a 14, as they all are built to die in 5 years and all are intrusive OS's.
So I bought an M50 a couple years ago to use with the adapter and bargain EF and EF-S lenses I got used cheap with a 20D a friend sold me (who uses an iPhone only), which I never used that 20D body nor wanted a 90D. Reading all the "M is dead" comments here helped me rethink things (thanks) about the M6ii thread I stalled buying another M50 the Mark 2 version with clean HDMI. So along came the R10, and I got motivated to buy it, but after reading all the No cheap or 3rd party AF R lens and no $500 inexpensive wide angle lenses really, I delayed and bought a Sony Apsc and 4 lens. The Sony isn't as difficult to navigate the menu's as I read, but the touch screen of the M50 is superior, and it articulates.
The M50 Its a great prosumer-hobby camera, touch screen interface and image enlargements with 2 finger stretch like a Smartphone.
So today's R100 announcement confuses me further as to continue with Sony (I want 2 more inexpensive MILC cameras for video podcast rental studio on the cheap side) and if this replaces the M50 there still are no inexpensive R lens, I dislike the EF adapter alternative now and rather buy the M50 mkii instead before it is discontinued or another Sony as there are inexpensive E mount cheap decent AF lens and Sigma and Tamrom supports AF. I even looked at the $1300 6D Mark 2 today just to have EF direct and Regular HD video (I could care less about 4k, file size, editing, storage, etc). So will wait to see, but the FX30 looks interesting and could use my few new E mount lens with it. What would you (anyone here) do if you had say $3000 budget for 2 more cameras in my situation? I could buy 2 more M50's and pancake lens... and tripods, etc. I have no need for 4k, 30 min limit no big deal, no 15 fps, or telephoto birds, cars, or mountain climbing- just home studio, still life, street and urban and indoor use, and some macro. I just see the M mount lens from Canon done, and Sigma EF-M dying off, inventory isn't everywhere I notice.