Canon EOS Rebel 750D Spec List [CR1]

[LetTheRightLensIn]

"HDR movie"

How?

And why a new 24.2 MP sensor for this and not the 7D2?
Is this maybe a new sensor that matches Exmor?
One could hope. Although poor 7D2.

 

[AshtonNekolah]

Heh. New Rebel better than the 7d2? Really? and it cost less, what a joke, even if its 24mp it could be a poli pixel 24mp if that is even true. There is no way a rebel will be on par with a high end body of that class, if MP floats your boat then I guess thats all people focus on is big MP big files, the 1DX and the 5D3 is not equal at all and if the 1Dx has a 18mp people really need to get there heads out of the sand. that's old news the censor is more important that huge files, I remember when MP use to be the hype looks like its coming back agian. IMO this is a bluff, some of it is valid but not all 100% that censor just could be the same size as the 7D2 and still not as robust. Much love for change but we will see when it is in the raw final product.

 

[vscd]

And why a new 24.2 MP sensor for this and not the 7D2?
Is this maybe a new sensor that matches Exmor?
One could hope. Although poor 7D2.

Why poor 7D2? This is a totally different approach. The 1DX has even less pixels than the 7D2 and I would always, ever and easily take the 1DX over everything with more pixels... especially if it's APS-C, only. The 7DM2 is a quick sportscamera with everything optimzed towards speed. On sport-cars you even pay a few grands more if you have lesser weight. There is no need to have 6 seats in a Porsche. So, the APS-C will satisfy the ones who need the pixels. The 7D2 has a whole unique point in the line for a quick response and Autofocus on par with the pro-Models.

Are we again on the stupid "Megapixelomania"? Hope not.

 

[AshtonNekolah]

And why a new 24.2 MP sensor for this and not the 7D2?
Is this maybe a new sensor that matches Exmor?
One could hope. Although poor 7D2.

Why poor 7D2? This is a totally different approach. The 1DX has even less pixels than the 7D2 and I would always, ever and easily take the 1DX over everything with more pixels... especially if it's APS-C, only. The 7DM2 is a quick sportscamera with everything optimzed towards speed. On sport-cars you even pay a few grands more if you have lesser weight. There is no need to have 6 seats in a Porsche. So, the APS-C will satisfy the ones who need the pixels. The 7D2 has a whole unique point in the line for a quick response and Autofocus on par with the pro-Models.

Are we again on the stupid "Megapixelomania"? Hope not.

Looks like it is to me from those comments. ;D

 

[3kramd5]

And why a new 24.2 MP sensor for this and not the 7D2?
Is this maybe a new sensor that matches Exmor?
One could hope. Although poor 7D2.

Let's pretend this isn't a rumor forum and take it as fact that the 750D has a 24.2MP sensor. I would assume that it would be substantially different from the 70D/7D2 sensor. I can't see a company like Canon, with its not-exactly-state-of-the-art sensor line, simultaneously developing and producing two sensors which only differ by a 20% delta in pixel count.

Rather, I would assume they serve different purposes. If the rebel has 24.2MP, I assume it does NOT have DPAF, for example.

Purpose matters.

 

[heikeormond]

I read on this page that the official announcement is expected in February at the CP+ Camera and Photo Imaging Show in Yokohama, Japan. Any confirmation on this?

 

[Tugela]

Yet more Canon fail :'(

So the rumored cameras wouldn't sell well? I doubt that. Rather I imagine it will be a relative success.

I won't buy one.

Target and Walmart are popular.....that doesn't mean that they sell superior products.

People who buy the Rebels don't know anything about cameras, they buy because it has a logo the recognize on the front. It is just like those idiots who line up to buy the first iPhone the day it is released. They are clueless about the hardware, they buy the logo.

 

[dolina]

Assuming the MP will be at 24.2 I wonder if the optical low pass filter (OLPF, anti-aliasing (AA) filter) will be removed like what Nikon did with their 24.2MP D3300 that was launched on January 7, 2014.

 

[jeffa4444]

I've been using Canon products since 1971, they revolutionised cameras with the AE-1 / A-1 and the introduction of the EF mount was massive at the time. Canon are great innovators but they are also quite conservative. As a result whilst I've kept pace with new Canon cameras & lenses I also invested in Olympus 4/3rds and then micro 4/3rds and I have to say things like the five axis stabilisation which Sony has just adopted make great sense rather than image stabilisation in every lens.
Canon in many ways are cutting edge in others they are not and sensors fall into the latter camp, whilst dual-pixel was cutting edge.
Partnerships make sense VW/ Mercedes have a partnership in vans, BMW with Roll-Royce aero engines and Canon like Nikon could equally have one with Sony who are the sensor leaders currently.

 

[tomscott]

I don't know why because a camera is small it has to be low down in the spec department.

Many a time I wish I could have FF in a size like the xxxd as the ergonomics are a million times better than any mirror less even the new A7II, like I love the SL1 but they crippled it same with the 6D with af and poor fps, so I don't see why a high end camera in a xxxD body would be a bad thing imo I would rather have the mirror at sl1 size than an a6000 or A7 etc and I have a Sony nex5 which I like but is too small and lenses poor compared to canon selection.

I'm currently traveling America for 3 months after 2months in South America and a camera like this would have been perfect instead I've carried over 6kg of my 5Dmkiii with lenses over 20,000 miles because I don't like the EVFs of the A7 the lenses are poor and think the 70ds 20mp sensor isn't great and the 18mp of the sl1 is awful and the 5ds perfect apart from weight is the best canon has for travel. Something that's 80-90% of the 5D in a smaller body would be brilliant. I know the mirror makes it impossible but a GOOD crop sensor is a good compromise but canon hasn't produced a good app sensor in years. I had the 7D and hated the base ISO performance and nikons 24mp Sony sensor seems to do quite well and much better dynamic range. So that would be a super camera.

So could this be an answer to higher end mirror less in a classic slr design?

Also it's strange if it were 24mp it would be Canons highest mp camera... At entry level...

 

[dak723]

People who buy the Rebels don't know anything about cameras, they buy because it has a logo the recognize on the front.

What a completely clueless statement. People who understand cameras understand that there is very little difference between the various digital models. Two years ago I rented a 6D, a 60D and did comparison shots with them and my rebel. Almost no difference in IQ. What the higher end (non-rebel) models offer is more bells and whistles and better AF. I enjoy the custom modes of my new 6D, but when taking the same shot with my 6D and my new SL1 and then printing them 8" x 10" you can't tell which is which when placed side by side. I used to own the original 6 MP original digital rebel and those pics were good enough to sell. I've been taking pictures for 35 years (and with many different cameras) so the logo doesn't matter - and I do know something about cameras.

 

[WoodyWindy]

Leaving the spec-ulation out of things for a moment, and focusing on the two bodies. Does NOBODY remember that the last major Rebel class announcement had two bodies: The 700D/T5i AND the 100D/SL1. Why could the forthcoming announcement not be for replacements for both cameras? One a powerful, yet very compact camera with a simplified interface (SL2), the other the most capability you can cram into a plastic body (T6i).

 

[LetTheRightLensIn]

And why a new 24.2 MP sensor for this and not the 7D2?
Is this maybe a new sensor that matches Exmor?
One could hope. Although poor 7D2.

Why poor 7D2? This is a totally different approach. The 1DX has even less pixels than the 7D2 and I would always, ever and easily take the 1DX over everything with more pixels... especially if it's APS-C, only. The 7DM2 is a quick sportscamera with everything optimzed towards speed. On sport-cars you even pay a few grands more if you have lesser weight. There is no need to have 6 seats in a Porsche. So, the APS-C will satisfy the ones who need the pixels. The 7D2 has a whole unique point in the line for a quick response and Autofocus on par with the pro-Models.

Are we again on the stupid "Megapixelomania"? Hope not.

No, see the part I just bolded above.

 

[LetTheRightLensIn]

People who buy the Rebels don't know anything about cameras, they buy because it has a logo the recognize on the front. It is just like those idiots who line up to buy the first iPhone the day it is released. They are clueless about the hardware, they buy the logo.

Maybe with some, but not with many. I've known many people who know a a lot of cameras and photography who purchased a Rebel. Camera gear is expensive and not everyone can afford a 5D3. And that really comes into play when you talk about HS, college and grad students. I mean there are plenty of those who have 5D3 and 1DX, but a lot have Rebels too.

 

[3kramd5]

Yet more Canon fail :'(

So the rumored cameras wouldn't sell well? I doubt that. Rather I imagine it will be a relative success.

I won't buy one.

Target and Walmart are popular.....that doesn't mean that they sell superior products.

No, they don't sell superior products to some other vendors. However, both are resounding successes.

That being said, which product is this non-existent camera demonstrably inferior to?

People who buy the Rebels don't know anything about cameras

heh

 

[instaimage]

People who buy the Rebels don't know anything about cameras, they buy because it has a logo the recognize on the front. It is just like those idiots who line up to buy the first iPhone the day it is released. They are clueless about the hardware, they buy the logo.

I know I am not alone with a list of gear... I own four 1DX's, one 5D3, two T5i's and two SL1's... they're tools, much like a hammer to a carpenter... for MY use, the T5i and SL1 are very difficult to beat (Nikon D3300 comes to mind but lenses...). Great image quality, ALL my lenses fit them... what's not to like about a $400-700 camera that will do the job perfectly?

I had a friend who sent out two images, one with a 1D series body and one with the latest Rebel. His question was, which one was with a sub $500 body and which one was with a $3500+ body... the resounding response... "We like this one." Which of course didn't answer the question... but... they "liked" the photo from the $500 body....

 

[mskrystalmeth]

Unless Canon is using that same 24mp that Nikon uses for their entry level cameras...Canon does not have a 24mp. They have two. 18mp and 20mp. One is dreadfully old, and the 20mp is not much better. DXOMARK has the ratings on those sensors.

 

[eninja]

Maybe this camera cater for the entry user market.
Professionals will always think more than twice to use rebel - so pro camera such as 70D above (my opinion) is safe.
entry market is now looking for high tech features like touch screen, NFC etc.
thus, these cameras.
you won't understand unless you look at business perspective.
- my opinion

 

[moreorless]

Unless Canon is using that same 24mp that Nikon uses for their entry level cameras...Canon does not have a 24mp. They have two. 18mp and 20mp. One is dreadfully old, and the 20mp is not much better. DXOMARK has the ratings on those sensors.

As has been said this cannot be the case, the smaller Canon APSC sensor would result in a lower pixel count.

 

[9VIII]

The idea that one of these bodies could be the SL2 is pretty exciting.
Fingers crossed that is the case.