HaroldC3 said:Canon without a clue once more.
neuroanatomist said:The key upgrade: +100 (as in 1200D to 1300D); that and the release date of 2016.
Look, people – this is the entry level to the entry level model. The target market is not anyone who owns a dSLR. This isn't intended to tempt anyone to upgrade their T3/1100D or T5/1200D. The target market is especially not anyone who reads CanonRumors. So criticize away, just understand the irrelevance of what you say.
PhotoGuy said:You have to love theae cheap cameras. They pack so much punch. I love it when they are used to show the people with multiple 1000€€ around their neck how its done - and they surely are capable of that!
I often wonder, how much would your photography improve, if you'd limit yourself to something like this? Would it actually be more fun because you dont even bother about fps or high iso?
Sort of like the cameraphone effect...
IglooEater said:neuroanatomist said:The key upgrade: +100 (as in 1200D to 1300D); that and the release date of 2016.
Look, people – this is the entry level to the entry level model. The target market is not anyone who owns a dSLR. This isn't intended to tempt anyone to upgrade their T3/1100D or T5/1200D. The target market is especially not anyone who reads CanonRumors. So criticize away, just understand the irrelevance of what you say.
Good points, and I agree with you. But it makes one wonder why they'd go to the bother of releasing a replacement with almost exactly the same specs as the one it's supposed to replace.
IglooEater said:neuroanatomist said:The key upgrade: +100 (as in 1200D to 1300D); that and the release date of 2016.
Look, people – this is the entry level to the entry level model. The target market is not anyone who owns a dSLR. This isn't intended to tempt anyone to upgrade their T3/1100D or T5/1200D. The target market is especially not anyone who reads CanonRumors. So criticize away, just understand the irrelevance of what you say.
Good points, and I agree with you. But it makes one wonder why they'd go to the bother of releasing a replacement with almost exactly the same specs as the one it's supposed to replace.
neuroanatomist said:ajfotofilmagem said:I know you can make good images with any current DSLR, but I imagine a beginner DSLR in the world, who wants to buy his first camera "for real."
These guys would be excited with 24 megapixel and ISO12800 (equal T6i). After the higher the number, the better the camera ... That would cost another $ 50? Maybe $ 100, but would be more appetizing, the eyes of a layman.
At that end of the market, a $50 or $100 difference can be very significant.
Mr Majestyk said:ajfotofilmagem said:I do not usually criticize new camera models, only through the specifications. But these are the most discouraging I have ever read.
My thoughts exactly, absolutely woeful specs for a 2016 camera, even entry level. One can only hope these specs are bogus otherwise the forums will go ballistic.