Re: Pricing & More Information About the EOS 6D Mark II [CR3]
ahsanford said:
LonelyBoy said:
I think you're far overusing that word, and it makes me sad because until the 6D2 rumors started heating up I had you pegged as one of the more reasonable, intelligent members around here. When you call anything that isn't perfect "nerfed" though (even when you pose it as a question), you start to sound a lot more like K.
And it makes me sad, because my eyes have started involuntarily rolling when I see your avatar now instead of looking forward to what I'm about to read.
Really? Wow! I honestly appreciate you sharing that. I'm not trying to throw logs in the fire at the Cult of K with this, but I just think there's come cleverness on Canon's part as to what we do / do not get. Whether we want to call that nerfing or simple omission for business reasons we can certainly debate.
But, so we're clear -- FTR, I am not...
- ...upset the 6D2 lacks something. I am not buying this or any other camera for a few years. My 5D3 is far more capable than I am, and I don't lack a key feature (tilty-flippy, DPAF, etc.) for what/how I like shoot.
- ...upset that Canon withholds a feature or two like this. It's business. (I admittedly whinge about the 5D line not having spot metering at any AF point because it's on my cell phone, far lower Nikon level SLRs, etc.)
- ...convinced everything the 6D2 didn't get from the 5D4 is a nefarious act from Canon. Some stuff simply costs more to put in, and that takes Canon out of its price/cost/margins place it would like to operate in. I fully get that.
I develop new products and product systems for a living in a different industry, so I appreciate how Canon has built its portfolio. I find it endlessly interesting.
My apologies if I go to the nerfing well too often. I don't say it to wind up the forum, but it's clear that's happening regardless. I'll try to rein it in, thx for the feedback.
- A
There needs to be a "tip of the cap" emoticon. I really didn't want to insult you, and I'm glad you accepted it in the spirit intended (which shoots you right back up the CR power rankings).
It just seemed like you (and others) used "nerfed" for anything removed, while I think it's better reserved for blatant cases of "I don't want to sell you this, I want to bait-and-switch you up the ladder".
For example (I know everyone hates car analogies, but they're clear), is the 4Runner a nerfed Lexus GX460? I'd say no; the V8 and all the extra toys, and the Lexus dealers themselves, cost more to make and support. Toyota is very happy to sell you a 4Runner, even though they'd probably rather sell you the GX. The same goes for, oh, the Focus and Fusion.
By contrast, there are cars that are straight-up nerfed. The Nissan Versa (work with me on the numbers, it's been a few years, so I don't remember exactly), at least at one point, offered a "$7,998" model. Which it did... unless you wanted an automatic transmission and A/C. If you wanted either of those, you had to step up a package, which cost something like $11k, so while I'm sure a bunch of people here can drive stick and prefer it, most Americans would walk into the dealer, look at the $8k Versa, and immediately think about the $11k one. Similarly, I used to have a poverty-spec Civic DX. On the nicer models (LX and EX), the door bumper protectors were body color. On mine, to make it look cheaper, they painted them black. They painted the protectors black AFTER PAINTING THEM BODY COLOR - over the years, the black would wear off, and the red would shine through in places. THAT is nerfing in its most blatant, ugly form.
I'm sure that at the meetings where they decide the final specs, for the 6D series and all other bodies, Canon discusses what to put in and what to leave out of every camera - including the 5D series. I honestly think most of it is about what can be afforded for the price that the camera is targeted at. Some things are going to be about not surpassing the next step up, but I suspect that is much, much lower than the list being complained about. Most of what's talked about here looks like the 6D series is lumped in with the Rebels other than its sensor, while the 7D is lumped into the pro/ semi-pro category, so it looks more like the 5Ds in features and specs. If we all went to Canon corporate and showed them this thread, they'd probably be baffled why serious gear-heads are looking at the 6D at all, since it's intended to be a smooth step-up for people like my friends who shoot D60s with whatever 18-55 they have and get results barely better than their iPhones. They're not building the 6D for people who hang out here, even if we lust after a cheap backup FF body. It would be like me complaining to Honda about the really tall gears on that old Civic - it's not supposed to be fast, it was supposed to be frugal, and tall gears help with that. Why would you want it to be fast?
Anyway I hope that made sense, it's been quite a day at work.