This is what they should of done from the jump, a photo and video version of the r5 instead of an r5 and r6.
Upvote
0
Canon should have just done everything right the first time. Adding another camera to the R line to combat the overheating just makes you lose more faith with consumers. I don't want to have to buy a whole new camera just because Canon didn't get it right the first time
Canon is reusing bodies, image sensors, and image processors.If Canon can standardize on a couple of body designs ( like car makers do), then maybe they can widen their Camera offerings with different sensors and electronics tweaks at little increase in production costs. Otherwise it is hard to see how they will make money by fractionating their offerings into so many niche pockets.
Canon should have just done everything right the first time. Adding another camera to the R line to combat the overheating just makes you lose more faith with consumers. I don't want to have to buy a whole new camera just because Canon didn't get it right the first time
I looked at the design of the S1H and the heatsink appears to be in a vented chamber outside of the weather sealing.I wouldn't hold any credence to what Canon Watch is reporting. A heat sink doesn't do a darn thing without a fan or dissipation. Period. And Canon knows that. Most everyone else in electronics does also. So the crap about heat sink is pretty much BS. Without a vent, space, or fan, it would pretty much be useless. Besides there's already a thin heatsink inside the tightly sealed R5 body, discovered during a recent teardown. Very little it does without dissipation of fast rising internal temperatures. Reach inside your PC and disconnect the fan and see how much that heat sink will do on its own when you start processing any video. Smartphones have heat sinks, and gamers still have to use external peltier smarphone radiator coolers.
I can forgive those people because the video in R5 is just useful enough to be frustrating.Those who live in the real world understand limitations and believe Canon did the R5 “right” the first time.
From what I’ve read the only people disappointed in the R5 are people who bought in to the hype (mostly driven by click whores on YouTube) that drove expectations beyond realistic capabilities.
Nobody forced anyone to buy the R5. If people bought it based on their own expectations prior to release and real world testing they have no one to blame except themselves.
I wouldn't hold any credence to what Canon Watch is reporting. A heat sink doesn't do a darn thing without a fan or dissipation. Period. And Canon knows that. Most everyone else in electronics does also. So the crap about heat sink is pretty much BS. Without a vent, space, or fan, it would pretty much be useless. Besides there's already a thin heatsink inside the tightly sealed R5 body, discovered during a recent teardown. Very little it does without dissipation of fast rising internal temperatures. Reach inside your PC and disconnect the fan and see how much that heat sink will do on its own when you start processing any video. Smartphones have heat sinks, and gamers still have to use external peltier smarphone radiator coolers.
If they made a metal conductor that went from the hot parts inside to the outside of the body - physically extended through the shell as a continuous piece - with a heat sync on the exposed part, the natural convection of just normal air, or better yet wind if outside, would help. If you put an active fan on that or a peltier device, it would go even better. But you'd have an inherent water vulnerability. You could weather seal around it, but in the event of a failure there its literally a conduit for water right where you don't want it. It would not be as good as a fan inside blowing directly on hot parts but with a way for fresh air to enter the body space.I wouldn't hold any credence to what Canon Watch is reporting. A heat sink doesn't do a darn thing without a fan or dissipation. Period. And Canon knows that. Most everyone else in electronics does also. So the crap about heat sink is pretty much BS. Without a vent, space, or fan, it would pretty much be useless. Besides there's already a thin heatsink inside the tightly sealed R5 body, discovered during a recent teardown. Very little it does without dissipation of fast rising internal temperatures. Reach inside your PC and disconnect the fan and see how much that heat sink will do on its own when you start processing any video. Smartphones have heat sinks, and gamers still have to use external peltier smarphone radiator coolers.
Combining high resolution with "speed" sounds impossible. It of course depends on how you interprets the term "speed". But already 12fps sounds unrealistic in my ears?
Somebody's wishful thinking?
Actually, I don't see myself buying these rumored cameras if I can buy the R5.This is what they should of done from the jump, a photo and video version of the r5 instead of an r5 and r6.
I didn't realize they belong to you, I thought they belong to the past.OK! Now where are my 5DMkV and 5DsR MkII ?
An OVF maybe, for the nostalgic amongst us. And great battery life....I didn't realize they belong to you, I thought they belong to the past.
No provocation intended, just curiosity. What is so valuable that you need to own a newly designed DSLR in 2020-2025? There must be some special reason, I just don't know.
After reviewing some older photos I found some nice shots made with Canon 10D. So I take back what I wrote in my earlier post and hereby declare: 6MP is plenty enough if you know what you are doing!I think the original 1Ds was 11. I say 11 is plenty
+1000An OVF maybe, for the nostalgic amongst us. And great battery life....
I can't understand why the Rate and Lock buttons can't be reassigned on the R5. I would not use them for their default purpose but I need to change between VF and LCD underwater and there aren't many options to do that as the face sensor is permanently blocked by the housing :-(I just hope the added models don't create so much fragmentation they lose focus on fixing/augmenting things via firmware.
They could add a fan yes, but then the entire body would change - not just a heatsink.Curious... this is a rumor of a new camera, so can we really say that they wouldn't add a fan somehow. It is possible, that they might just use the patented adaptor to evict the heat.
A thin heatsink... technically wrong. Thermodynamically a heat sink should have mass to "pull" in the heat. Then from there you push air over the heat sink to remove the heat from the heat sink. So when I saw the teardown video, I know that the video creators did not understand what they were seeing. Sadly, there was so much mis-information put out.