Full-resolution sample images from the EOS R5, EOS R6, and the new lenses

Canon Rumors Guy

EOS-1D X Mark III
CR Pro
Jul 20, 2010
9,031
1,790
Canada
www.canonrumors.com
Last edited by a moderator:

6degrees

RF 85mm F1.2
Sep 6, 2018
122
83
I would like to see how DXOMark rank RF85 F1.2, etc., on R5, especially comparing to Otus lenses.
 

Mark3794

EOS 90D
Sep 4, 2018
166
511
Rolling shutter, probably he is trolling us with a powered off fan :ROFLMAO:
r5rs.jpg
 

ahsanford

Particular Member
Aug 16, 2012
8,617
1,642
He wrote on the Dpreview forum that he started some measurements. He said he got the exactly same read noise as the 1DXmarkIII


This is going to be such a nice bump in dynamic range over my 5D3 -- can't wait to see how it comes out, but this is a rough idea of what we'll find:

1595514762935.png


- A
 
  • Like
Reactions: fox40phil

Colorado

EOS M6 Mark II
Dec 16, 2013
53
152
For those that don't read the fred miranda forums as soon as these images were posted they decided most of them were crap. Not because of the hardware--though they weren't big fans of the 600/800mm lenses--but because they thought there were tons of photographer errors. To the point that they wondered if Canon specifically hired people to take the worst photos possible for samples.

Just curious what the CR crowd evaluation is.
 

koenkooi

EOS 5D Mark IV
CR Pro
Feb 25, 2015
1,612
1,468
For those that don't read the fred miranda forums as soon as these images were posted they decided most of them were crap. Not because of the hardware--though they weren't big fans of the 600/800mm lenses--but because they thought there were tons of photographer errors. To the point that they wondered if Canon specifically hired people to take the worst photos possible for samples.

Just curious what the CR crowd evaluation is.

Canon is quite (in)famous for having the most crappy sample pictures, so it isn't really surprising that people would say it about these as well.
 

Sharlin

EOS R
CR Pro
Dec 26, 2015
1,361
1,242
Turku, Finland
Did anyone actually say that?

It's a fact that a blurred background requires more separation at f/11 than say, f/2.8, but it's also a fact that if you can get the separation, you'll get blur.

I think the point was that some people may have underestimated how much the focal length matters. At 600mm or 800mm you're going to get blurred backgrounds no matter what. A 800mm f/2.8 would be a sight to behold, btw ;)
 

koenkooi

EOS 5D Mark IV
CR Pro
Feb 25, 2015
1,612
1,468
I think the point was that some people may have underestimated how much the focal length matters. At 600mm or 800mm you're going to get blurred backgrounds no matter what. A 800mm f/2.8 would be a sight to behold, btw ;)

Does it come equipped with its own truck?
 
  • Like
Reactions: RMac and Sharlin

StevenA

EOS M6 Mark II
CR Pro
Jul 8, 2020
91
190
REALLY excited for these bodies and lenses. I went with the R5 kit with the 24-105 and the 100-500 on release day. Just ordered the 15-35 yesterday. I sold my 5dmiv a couple days ago and didn't even weep putting it in the mail. Although I am completely camera-less at the moment and only have the EF 16-35 iii to look at and hold, but it's up for sale also.

I'm all in on the new system and I couldn't be happier, and I don't think I will be disappointed either. :D

Those samples of the 100-500 are so sweet. Too bad that lens isn't slated for release until the end of September. :(
 
<-- start Taboola -->