rrcphoto said:
arcer said:
Chaitanya said:
by 1.5cms only and its slower as well.
Hey, don't underestimate that 1.5cm. In someone's universe, it is quite plenty and worth millions of profit. :
looks pretty important to me:
Not trying to imply that it is not important though. Apologies for the dig on someone made you mistaken my viewpoint along the way.
In terms of rebel kits, length reduction are well welcomed by its' intended market. I have been asked a lot of times by friends that are casual shooters if there are shorter lens for their Canon DSLRs. You might asked why they choose a DSLR if they are so size-conscious, but they understand the need for ergonomics and they really loved the feel on Canon Rebels compared to other brands and P&S. However, their reasons for shorter lens is that they hope that they can fit the cameras better without damaging the lens in non-camera specific bags.
I lend them my 24mm STM and 50mm prime sometimes and they really loved them. However, they still lack the incentive of expanding their kit due to not wanting to spend too much on this small hobby. So, it's no surprise that in the real world, a lot of people relies on their kit lens and some have really made great works with them.
On a side note, even though I'm just a photography hobbyist with the odd photo gig here and there, I spend most of my free time contributing to helping college students with their SU(/SA) activities and promotional works, and also spreading the love of photography to more people. No matter if they are using iPhones, mirrorless, or DSLR, the spreading of good photography technique and etiquette is more important than obtaining the best and latest cutting-edge gear.
As many have said, it's not about the gear in your hands, but the mind behind it.