Agreed. The RP seems like a good size. I wouldn't mind something like that or something just a bit smaller as a second body. I have the M50 now and previously had the M3. I love the quality and features of the M, but really don't like the compactness of the button layout. I would prefer a second body that can utilize my RF lenses when I want, but also be compact when I need it to be. As an early R camera, the RP features were okay. But if I'm going budget R and it offers less resolution than the R5, I would prefer it to offer some sort of differentiation. APS-C would fit the bill for me. Not sure if that makes sense to anyone else.In terms of body sizes, the RP is the goldilocks of body size. Smaller than R3/5/6 and approximately the same size as the larger M bodies
M50ii = 387g. 116 x 88 x 59 mm
M6ii = 408g. 120 x 70 x 49 mm
RP = 485g. 133 x 85 x 70 mm
A RP without EVF would be a lot smaller and lighter... in proportion as the M6ii vs M200
M200 = 299g. 108 x 67 x 35 mm
Of course, the M6ii has significantly better specs vs RP in some respects
Upvote
0