No top screen, weak buffer, little weather resistance compared to the R6/R5...The R7 is a 90D replacement...
Upvote
0
In the mean time, it's a safe bet that the M50 line will continue.DPREVIEW site said it is $1100 with the 18-45. it is still expensive. I hope they can have an M50 price range R model
You realize that the sensors on the A6100/6400/6600 and Z50/Zfc are 5 years old at least, right? And they have the same EVF resolution or worse, and worse screen resolution. Also, they don't shoot as fast, have video recording limits, and worse thermal architecture...Canon has just bumped the sales of Sony and Nikon, these cameras are a pile of crap, I've used canon since 1980, I'm buying a Nikon Z9, and dumping my R5, these cameras are a scam, using a three year old sensor, and the screen and view finder are out of a child's toy. Is it April the first or something, these are a pile of scrap. Well done canon, you're driving your customers to Nikon and Sony.
Not necessarily. I'm far from the most refined EVF connoisseur (if it's 2.36 Mdots or higher, I'm good), but the RP's one weakness, for me, is its slow refresh rate. It looks like Canon are driving the displays on both the R10 and R7 much quicker, probably 120 FPS in performance mode, and that would be more than enough.Yep, the EVF is the biggest cripple hammer by far. If anyone has used the R6/R5 side by side the difference in clarity and quality is huge. So, the fact the R7 is worse than the R6 means it will be very crunchy and digital. I would love to hear from RP shooters how they find their EVF.
You realize that the sensors on the A6100/6400/6600 and Z50/Zfc are 5 years old at least, right? And they have the same EVF resolution or worse, and worse screen resolution. Also, they don't shoot as fast, have video recording limits, and worse thermal architecture...
I mean, I'm usually hyper-critical of Canon. I see fault in everything they do. But the release of the R7/10 is, if anything, a massive kick in everyone's collective asses. Sony, Nikon and even Fujifilm. They've been slacking.
直販価格は、ボディ単体が197,780円、「EOS R7・RF-S18-150 IS STM レンズキット」が246,180円。
「EOS R10」ボディ単体が128,480円、「EOS R10・RF-S18-45 IS STM レンズキット」が143,880円、「EOS R10・RF-S18-150 IS STM レンズキット」が176,880円。
I would not hold my breathHere's hoping this is a sign that the next firmware update to the R5/6 will include a removing of the 30 limit record limit.
I would go with the R7 for sure. The rolling shutter in the R6 is a bit slow.I have a Canon EOS R and a R5 C and I'm a video first guy. Should I get a Canon R6 to use the same battery grip and smallrig cage as the R5 C or should I go with the R7? Something tells me the R6 is a better option even for video, but that "recording no limit" and possibly no overheating is interesting. I still think the Canon R6 is a better option to optimise the grip and cage/similar ergonomics.
My favorite part of Canon releasing new cameras is all the insightful comments from new users on CR...Canon has just bumped the sales of Sony and Nikon, these cameras are a pile of crap, I've used canon since 1980, I'm buying a Nikon Z9, and dumping my R5, these cameras are a scam, using a three year old sensor, and the screen and view finder are out of a child's toy. Is it April the first or something, these are a pile of scrap. Well done canon, you're driving your customers to Nikon and Sony.
So what? Is Canon doo*** again?
That tarrif sunset before the R3 came outBecause there are tariffs that determine camera import pricing, and having that 30minute limit puts them in a different. Because its literally a software thing, they could undo it, but that may cause them issues since they will have then mis-classified the item they imported and sold.
Im honestly surprised at this point that every camera company hasnt just accepted that their digital cams are video cameras and just paid the difference to remove the limit. Especially since a camera with these specs has existed for over 5 years in the market (GH5, etc). The fact they are doing it with these lower priced cameras might be the sign they are finally doing so