Do we know the mp count yet?
lol, jk......yet some people keep asking. smh
lol, jk......yet some people keep asking. smh
Upvote
0
The count woulda been the headline.Do we know the mp count yet?
lol, jk......yet some people keep asking. smh
because readingThe count woulda been the headline.
I have not ruled out the 80/20 MP rumor with QPAFTo really move the needle, the R1 would have to have at least 80mp
It was the reverse.The Techradar "source" is a Canon Watch article that claims 45MP and quad pixel autofocus. Canon says the R3 will have next generation dual pixel AF so we already have reason to believe that at least half of the Canon Watch information is wrong. This calls into question thr reliability of the 45MP claim from the same source.
RF can't ever replace EF.R5 just isn't enough of a step to switch to RF given the investment I have in EF bodies and lenses
You can use a drop-in adapter and have filters for any EF lensThis is why I mostly use EF glass on my R5—the drop-in filters.
There seems to be more than enough evidence to support that but as the saying goes but there is no date for an announcement of any kind.But knowing that the announcement is near
No, it is not.Sony's A1 is billed as a sports camera
Nokishita has more leaks than practically any other industry.Japanese people have another mentality though. If their employer tells them to keep a secret, they will do that.
There are still rumors of an R5cThere is the R5, and a lot of videographers are using it and loving it.
There is closed-caption and the auto-translate worked pretty well for me.Can someone who can understand what he's saying tell us if anything new is being said?
That is pretty typical.Are you suggesting they designed and built a processing pipeline, buffer, etc., capable of handling 45 MP at 30 fps, while planning to decide later whether to use 45 MP or 30 MP? Seems unlikely.
At the prototyping stage, yes. At the gearing up for production stage? No, too late.That is pretty typical.
If the 45MP version does not work out then they could fall back to the 30MP version.
It is called contingency.
As much as I agree with that, we have no idea at what stage the rumors emerged.At the prototyping stage, yes. At the gearing up for production stage? No, too late.
I would prefer 45mp but totally agree with you that the other issues are paramount. I'm getting spoiled with the R5's high res... but lets remember the 30mp is still 50% higher than the 1dxlll & idxll. Your last point vis-a-vis high ISO is spot on!I agree and in all honesty whether the camera is 30 MP or 45 MP makes little difference to me. For me the specs that are more important are:
- electronic shutter with adjustable fps not just 30 fps
- buffer depth when shooting
- spot metering link to AF point
- AF acquisition speed
- highISO noise and base ISO dynamic range
From what I hear from a photographer in Tokyo this is correct!I heard from a photographer using one that it is 24mp, but I think they have all been asked to keep it secret so I don't really believe that.
24 MP in 3:2 would be exactly 6KFrom what I hear from a photographer in Tokyo this is correct!
The Canon R3 has a 24 mp sensor - resolution 6000x4000 px
The info is from a reliable source that I trust!
I have been following all the development news and forum talk, but this is the first time that I can contribute with something relevant (so I registered)