Looks like a great step in the right direction....
Upvote
0
goldenhusky said:I don't need your advice just mind your own business.
transpo1 said:It’s too bad about the crop and no 4K DPAF. Together, those kill a lot of interest in this camera.
Sharlin said:goldenhusky said:I don't need your advice just mind your own business.
Don't post on forums then where someone might, gasp, reply to your ramblings.
Even on a camera that doesn't make use of UHS-II speed. Great logic!goldenhusky said:Talys said:rrcphoto said:goldenhusky said:SD/SDHC/SDXC memory card UHS-I compatible WTF Canon?
who really cares about this? on an entry level camera?
Exactly.
It is 2018. UHS ll was introduced back in 2011 and it is expected to be in a camera in 2018.
tron said:Even on a camera that doesn't make use of UHS-II speed. Great logic!goldenhusky said:It is 2018. UHS ll was introduced back in 2011 and it is expected to be in a camera in 2018.
Woody said:Pupil AF only in AF-S mode. Sigh...
I hope it's just a handicap in the M50, not a limitation imposed by the DIGIC 8 processing speed.
Woody said:Pupil AF only in AF-S mode. Sigh...
I hope it's just a handicap in the M50, not a limitation imposed by the DIGIC 8 processing speed.
tron said:Even on a camera that doesn't make use of UHS-II speed. Great logic!goldenhusky said:Talys said:rrcphoto said:goldenhusky said:SD/SDHC/SDXC memory card UHS-I compatible WTF Canon?
who really cares about this? on an entry level camera?
Exactly.
It is 2018. UHS ll was introduced back in 2011 and it is expected to be in a camera in 2018.
TonyPicture said:The main differences seem to point to the m50 being a better camera, with added flip-out screen, 4k, DPOF file format, DIGIC 8 processor, IBIS, more auto focus points... yet the price is a lot lower than the m5!
Can anyone explain what's going on?
Sharlin said:TonyPicture said:The main differences seem to point to the m50 being a better camera, with added flip-out screen, 4k, DPOF file format, DIGIC 8 processor, IBIS, more auto focus points... yet the price is a lot lower than the m5!
Can anyone explain what's going on?
There’s no IBIS. I don’t get how people think there is.
Anyway, it’s a nice leap in technology but it’s still an entry-level body. However, I suspect an M5 Mark II isn’t that far off.
TonyPicture said:According to Canon's website in the movie mode it has 'In-camera Digital IS' and I see now so did the M5(I didn't know that)
But lets not get bogged down here with that issue, I'm really wondering why the better looking camera ref specs is so much cheaper?
I do not believe that someone who selects both RAW and JPG is a person who would utilize 10fps. Plus this camera is not a sports one (although admittedly higher fps can be used for anything not only sports). Having said that higher specs are always welcome in every model. I do not defend Canon. I believe eventually they will turn to the faster standard. And if I saw a 7D3 and/or a 5DsRMkII with a UHS-I controller I would be upset!Don Haines said:tron said:Even on a camera that doesn't make use of UHS-II speed. Great logic!goldenhusky said:Talys said:rrcphoto said:goldenhusky said:SD/SDHC/SDXC memory card UHS-I compatible WTF Canon?
who really cares about this? on an entry level camera?
Exactly.
It is 2018. UHS ll was introduced back in 2011 and it is expected to be in a camera in 2018.
At the video storage rate of 120 Mbits/ second , you are writing to the card at 15Mbytes per second, easily done on UHS-1.
If you store Raw files plus Jpgs, you need about 40 Mbytes times 10FPS, or about 400MBytes per second to keep up.... UHS-2 would certainly help here.....
Sharlin said:TonyPicture said:According to Canon's website in the movie mode it has 'In-camera Digital IS' and I see now so did the M5(I didn't know that)
Yeah, M5 indeed has it too. But IBIS usually is taken to mean stabilization based on physically moving the sensor. Which no Canon cameras has.