Here are the Canon EOS R7 and Canon EOS R10

[Fletchahh]

I never ended up closing the video's page, so here's some choice stills!

 

[Bob Howland]

I think it was added by mistake

And I think it was done intentionally. This sort of thing happens all the time. I ordered my 5D two days before its introduction because the sell sheet from Canon Spain appeared on the Internet.

 

[Sharlin]

Looks a great camera, what do you think the price's? If its like 1100$-1200$ maybe I'll consider it. If it's 1500$ or more I don't see a point of getting a Canon R6 instead. We'll know very soon anyway.

No chance in hell it's going to be less than $1500 MSRP, especially with the component shortage and now inflation eating profit margins. The R6 is still $2500 and gives way fewer pixels per duck. I'm guessing $1600 to $1800.

 

[Sharlin]

Oh, it has Scene Modes and Creative Filters options on the mode dial. Thank goodness, I definitely wouldn't survive without those!

 

[blackcoffee17]

No chance in hell it's going to be less than $1500 MSRP, especially with the component shortage and now inflation eating profit margins. The R6 is still $2500 and gives way fewer pixels per duck. I'm guessing $1600 to $1800.

The R7 will be no less than $2000 in my opinion.

 

[Bonich]

Pics look interesting.

Something I don't get:
That AF/MF switch on the front side. I wouldn't want to have it there.
Why there? Why at all?
If it isn't on the RF-S lenses anymore, then make it SW in the camera menu.

SW AF/MF switch sucks, I can tell you.
Using the 16 2.8 on the EOS R is all OK beside the missing switch.
The only workaround I can live with is BBAF.

 

[Jasonmc89]

I wouldn't be surprised if these will replace the R and the RP.

The original R won’t be replaced. It was a one off, introduction t the R system, camera. If anything then the R5 is already the R replacement.

 

[Kharan]

No love for the R10 introduction video? Just noticed the thumbnail in a photo

 

[Del Paso]

What I really hate about the EOS R is its EVF definition (3,7 million dots).
But only 2,36 for a new camera???
Sorry Canon, but for me, the VF is a major feature in a camera, and a reason to buy or not to buy.

 

[Sharlin]

No love for the R10 introduction video? Just noticed the thumbnail in a photo

Yeah, I meant to watch it but then it was already pulled when I tried.

 

[Jasonmc89]

I really hope these pics are just mockups. The R7 design and controls look horrifying. If this is actually the final design, then this is a hard pass from me! Not at all a continuation of the past 7D line in usability and a huge step backwards.

Again, hoping these photos are nonsense.

You’ve not tried it yet…?

 

[ItRainsSmiles]

No love for the R10 introduction video? Just noticed the thumbnail in a photo

It was actually good. He mentioned how affordable it is a few times Besides that it was announced as "not an entry level camera".

 

[blackcoffee17]

The lenses are a disappointment. Two very dark zooms starting at 29mm equivalent.
How could Nikon make a 24-75 with 3.5-5.6 which is the same size as Canon's 29-72?

Or how can Sigma make a very good 18-50 2.8 which weighs 290g?

 

[Kharan]

It was actually good. He mentioned how affordable it is a few times Besides that it was announced as "not an entry level camera".

Thanks for the comment. Do you remember how it looked from the back? Any surprises? Does it have a video record limit?

 

[pzyber]

Nope, because these are crop ones

True but what I meant is that they might stop selling RP and R when these are out. R6 and R5 already exist as a fullframe replacement.

The original R won’t be replaced. It was a one off, introduction t the R system, camera. If anything then the R5 is already the R replacement.

That's what I meant, "replace" was a bit bad of a wording.

 

[Fletchahh]

No love for the R10 introduction video? Just noticed the thumbnail in a photo

I already closed page for that one by time I noticed it was made private, sorry

 

[blackcoffee17]

It was actually good. He mentioned how affordable it is a few times Besides that it was announced as "not an entry level camera".

$1500 is the new "affordable"

 

[ItRainsSmiles]

Thanks for the comment. Do you remember how it looked from the back? Any surprises? Does it have a video record limit?

Sorry I don't remember any details, since my mind was still at the R7 video ^^##

 

[Bishop80]

Of course, Canon designed this lever at that position for a certain reason: it is a good position for the majority of testers.
And maybe for you, too.
Maybe I am the minority in finding that position bad, but together with focus by wire I just don‘t get it.

And I come from the point of view, that I can do MF since I was using my fathers FTb

We could be putting too much faith in Canon, but I hope that they progressively make each generation of camera and body style more attuned to what users want. Of course they could still miss the mark, like with this AF/MF switch.

I don't disagree on the location. That may be a bad spot. As long as I can reach a button without finger contortion, I (my small hands) can work with it. Fat, fidgety, or forgetful fingers may disagree and need a different location, or just disable it in the menu. My 1DX Mark III has buttons everywhere, but once I programmed and learned them, they very usable.

 

[Eriknoteric]

Some video screenshots:

View attachment 203838

View attachment 203839

View attachment 203841

View attachment 203842

View attachment 203843


I notice a dedicated ISO button on top...

That is devastating. How can canon go back to not having three adjustment dials. It might be a complete deal breaker to me. For the life of me I don’t understand why canon would wouldn’t just put a crop sensor in the r6 body and call it the r7