An RF Zoom fisheye is coming [CR2]

Canon Rumors Guy

Canon EOS 40D
CR Pro
Jul 20, 2010
10,839
3,199
Canada
www.canonrumors.com
We have been told that a zoom fisheye similar to the EF version will be coming for the RF mount. It will be an “all-new” optical design and will work just fine on both crop and full-frame cameras. The EF 8-15mm f/4L USM was quite a popular niche lens, and we’d expect a similar focal

See full article...
 

Del Paso

M3 Singlestroke
CR Pro
Aug 9, 2018
3,395
4,319
Is there really a demand for fish eye lenses these days with so many 3rd parties offering options for both FF and Crop. Granted personally I would like to see atleast some MILC manufacturer address 180/200mm Macro and in case of Canon MP-E 65mm replacement.
Me too!
A 180 macro with optical stabilization would be fine! A 50-60 macro too!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0

Del Paso

M3 Singlestroke
CR Pro
Aug 9, 2018
3,395
4,319
Is there really a demand for fish eye lenses these days with so many 3rd parties offering options for both FF and Crop. Granted personally I would like to see atleast some MILC manufacturer address 180/200mm Macro and in case of Canon MP-E 65mm replacement.
But wouldn't you rather need an RF 800mm macro for cobras and other friendly reptiles? :D
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0
I bought the ef 8-15mm L fisheye as soon as it was available and it's a really fun lens that is suprisingly versatile. However it needs judicious use in a collection of photographs. It's ability to cover fully circular 8mm and full recilinear 15mm fisheye views is unique. It's very small and light...and with a ef-rf drop in filter adapter...I can use ND filters with it.
I personally can't see what a RF version can bring to the table except that it gives Canon permission to kill off the old ef version in 5 years or so.
There are a few niche ef lenses that really do need a warm over. These will never see the light of day as mk II ef lenses...so my only hope is that thye will be RF lenses instead. The ef 180mm f3.5 L macro is another of those niche lenses. It's far better than any other variant of it's type from any other brand. It's not until you try the Sigma, Nikon, tamron etc until you realise how good the Canon variant is in comparision. But it could do with newer optics, coatings, AF motors and yes...a modern macro capabile IS system. However, the EF version is so niche it still commands a high price...I shudder to think what Canon would charge for an RF version!
If canon were smart with their TSE-RF lenses, they would include a rear drop in filter slot. That would level the "features" playing field between ef and rf variants.
I like the idea of a super wide f1.2 prime lens. Looking at the block chart...that's got some seriously funky glass shapes in there...that isn't going to be cheap or light weight!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Upvote 0
Is there really a demand for fish eye lenses these days with so many 3rd parties offering options for both FF and Crop. Granted personally I would like to see atleast some MILC manufacturer address 180/200mm Macro and in case of Canon MP-E 65mm replacement.

Absolutely! I love my EF version and use it at every wedding. I will be upgrading when the RF version comes out. As stated in other posts, niche lenses like the fisheye, MP-65mm and tilt-shift varieties are what makes Canon special.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
Upvote 0

Roo

CR Pro
Sep 12, 2013
1,003
338
Melbourne
Is there really a demand for fish eye lenses these days with so many 3rd parties offering options for both FF and Crop. Granted personally I would like to see atleast some MILC manufacturer address 180/200mm Macro and in case of Canon MP-E 65mm replacement.
Absolutely - still using my 8-15 for sports regularly.
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: 3 users
Upvote 0
Sep 17, 2014
1,042
1,399
I bought the ef 8-15mm L fisheye as soon as it was available and it's a really fun lens that is suprisingly versatile. However it needs judicious use in a collection of photographs. It's ability to cover fully circular 8mm and full recilinear 15mm fisheye views is unique. It's very small and light...and with a ef-rf drop in filter adapter...I can use ND filters with it.
I personally can't see what a RF version can bring to the table except that it gives Canon permission to kill off the old ef version in 5 years or so.
There are a few niche ef lenses that really do need a warm over. These will never see the light of day as mk II ef lenses...so my only hope is that thye will be RF lenses instead. The ef 180mm f3.5 L macro is another of those niche lenses. It's far better than any other variant of it's type from any other brand. It's not until you try the Sigma, Nikon, tamron etc until you realise how good the Canon variant is in comparision. But it could do with newer optics, coatings, AF motors and yes...a modern macro capabile IS system. However, the EF version is so niche it still commands a high price...I shudder to think what Canon would charge for an RF version!
If canon were smart with their TSE-RF lenses, they would include a rear drop in filter slot. That would level the "features" playing field between ef and rf variants.
I like the idea of a super wide f1.2 prime lens. Looking at the block chart...that's got some seriously funky glass shapes in there...that isn't going to be cheap or light weight!

Interesting because i heard exactly the opposite from a pro photographer who sold the Sigma 180mm macro for the Canon version and said it was not worth it.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0

roby17269

R5, H5X + IQ1-80, DJI Mini & Mavic 3 Pro, GoPro 10
Feb 26, 2014
465
573
New York
rdmfashionphoto.com
Is there really a demand for fish eye lenses these days with so many 3rd parties offering options for both FF and Crop. Granted personally I would like to see atleast some MILC manufacturer address 180/200mm Macro and in case of Canon MP-E 65mm replacement.
Yes a long RF macro would be good... but, more importantly, where's my RF 35mm f/1.2L?!? :LOL:
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
Upvote 0

fr34k

Canon R5 and lots of RF glass
Jul 16, 2022
67
80
But wouldn't you rather need an RF 800mm macro for cobras and other friendly reptiles? :D
but cuddling with those amazing creatures is half of the experience, don't you think? :love:
don't forget about effective aperture though. you'd be blasting those animals with laser light to get a bright image...
 
  • Haha
Reactions: 1 users
Upvote 0

koenkooi

CR Pro
Feb 25, 2015
3,657
4,237
The Netherlands
[...]There are a few niche ef lenses that really do need a warm over. These will never see the light of day as mk II ef lenses...so my only hope is that thye will be RF lenses instead. The ef 180mm f3.5 L macro is another of those niche lenses. It's far better than any other variant of it's type from any other brand. It's not until you try the Sigma, Nikon, tamron etc until you realise how good the Canon variant is in comparision. But it could do with newer optics, coatings, AF motors and yes...a modern macro capabile IS system. However, the EF version is so niche it still commands a high price...I shudder to think what Canon would charge for an RF version! [...]
The EF180L allows me to use the CPL drop in filter, which saves $$$$ for a front mount CPL :) Comparing the RF100L, RF85STM and the EF180L, I find that the R5/R8 AF system works a lot better with fast AF motors. That makes me wish for an RF180L, but I agree that will likely be a €2500 lens.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
Upvote 0

P-visie

EOS 5 - R5
CR Pro
Sep 14, 2020
132
237
Netherlands
www.p-visie.nl
My wishlist for an RF 180 or 200mm L macrolens, ranked by importance (to me, from high to lower):
  • Same (or better) optical quality as the EF 180 mm
  • 1:1 magnification
  • Fast AF
  • Compatible with RF extenders (for increased working distance with dragonflies, butterflies and other insects)
  • Sufficient number of aperture blades for a round opening (for good bokeh)
  • Image stabilization
  • Internal focusing (like the EF 180 mm)
  • Focus limiter (from closest focus to +/- 1 meter)
  • f 2.8
  • Removable tripod collar
  • Weight: equivalent to, or lighter than, the EF 180 mm
And please NO Spherical Aberration Control.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
Upvote 0
Jun 27, 2013
1,861
1,099
38
Pune
But wouldn't you rather need an RF 800mm macro for cobras and other friendly reptiles? :D
For really dangerous snakes(large vipers) have been using EF 100-400mm II and with mirrorless I will get RF 100-400(saw one of birder carry that lens recently so gave it a try on dragonflies, found it highly impressive for its price). Otherwise its for small butterflies(for larger butterflies and Odonates EF/RF 100-400mm work beautifully) and some shy frogs for which 180/200mm Macro will work perfectly.
Interesting because i heard exactly the opposite from a pro photographer who sold the Sigma 180mm macro for the Canon version and said it was not worth it.
What version of Sigma 180mm lens were they using? I know quite a lot of butterfliers who still use their Sigma 180mm(2.8 and old 3.5) and they are very happy with their lens(with 2.8 common complaint is the weight). Unfortunately all 180mm lenses have been discontinued(though they seem to be fairly common on used market), given Tamron was quite old by the time Sigma updated their 180mm and it was choice between heavy 2.8 with stabilization but no Weather sealing vs Canon's 180mm macro without OS but with weather sealing and light on back.
My wishlist for an RF 180 or 200mm L macrolens, ranked by importance (to me, from high to lower):
  • Same (or better) optical quality as the EF 180 mm
  • 1:1 magnification
  • Fast AF
  • Compatible with RF extenders (for increased working distance with dragonflies, butterflies and other insects)
  • Sufficient number of aperture blades for a round opening (for good bokeh)
  • Image stabilization
  • Internal focusing (like the EF 180 mm)
  • Focus limiter (from closest focus to +/- 1 meter)
  • f 2.8
  • Removable tripod collar
  • Weight: equivalent to, or lighter than, the EF 180 mm
And please NO Spherical Aberration Control.
Add NO focus shift as well otherwise that wishlist is what any new 180/200mm Macro lens should be.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0
Jun 27, 2013
1,861
1,099
38
Pune
but cuddling with those amazing creatures is half of the experience, don't you think? :love:
don't forget about effective aperture though. you'd be blasting those animals with laser light to get a bright image...
Been there done that and cant share pics of that rather its a behaviour forwned upon and for a good reason.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0