CanonFanBoy said:Let's not forget the quartz actually moves too. It vibrates an exact number of times each second.
... that’s how we got here
Upvote
0
CanonFanBoy said:Let's not forget the quartz actually moves too. It vibrates an exact number of times each second.
Rocky said:For "spinning pendulum" timed mechanical watch, the second hand movement is continuous.
For "quartz" timed mechanical watch, the second hand movement is stepping each second.
Some fake Rolex are so good that they are fully mechanical, case and band look exactly like the real one. One trick is to weight them with accuracy up to 0.1 gramCanonFanBoy said:Rocky said:For "spinning pendulum" timed mechanical watch, the second hand movement is continuous.
For "quartz" timed mechanical watch, the second hand movement is stepping each second.
And that's how one spots a fake Rolex.
Rocky said:Some fake Rolex are so good that they are fully mechanical, case and band look exactly like the real one. One trick is to weight them with accuracy up to 0.1 gramCanonFanBoy said:Rocky said:For "spinning pendulum" timed mechanical watch, the second hand movement is continuous.
For "quartz" timed mechanical watch, the second hand movement is stepping each second.
And that's how one spots a fake Rolex.
Rocky said:For "spinning pendulum" timed mechanical watch, the second hand movement is continuous.
For "quartz" timed mechanical watch, the second hand movement is stepping each second.
AvTvM said:i must admit, that i do prefer analog DISPLAY on timepieces.
privatebydesign said:Further, the smoothest Rolex second hand movements are quartz modulated.
Now you understand the importance of a comfortable user interface and ergonomics. While a digital watch can make it easier to see the precise time, an analog watch is quick, easy and comfortable.AvTvM said:i must admit, that i do prefer analog DISPLAY on timepieces. Because i am old enough to have grown up with it ... clockface, 2 clock-hands/needles ... 1 quick glance and i know what time it is, with more than sufficient precision for anything i do.
Your ideal world. Others may have different preferences.That said, i dont want or like mechanical/geared stuff ... so in my ideal world
Why is this about what you should have to "put up with?"Now, more than 30 years later I still should have to put up with mirror and submirrors slapping when all i want is
AvTvM said:just the other way round. Stupid Canon will soon enough realize that i - AND MANY OTHERS
BeenThere said:I waited ten years for a watch that had the features that I wanted. Unfortunately, I was late a lot during that period.
There was discussion of this a while back when the rumor floated that a "hybrid" VF was in the works. I agree, this would be a nice transition.neuroanatomist said:I have a smartwatch that allows me to choose an analog-style clock face, a digital clock face, or a combination display, as I choose.
Wouldn't it be great if my ILC offered a mirror and OVF for quick response, tracking, and better battery life, but could also get the mirror out of the way to show the sensor feed for a WYSIWYG display, enhanced brightness in dim light, and information overlays? Yeah...I'd really like an ILC like that!!
Orangutan said:There was discussion of this a while back when the rumor floated that a "hybrid" VF was in the works. I agree, this would be a nice transition.neuroanatomist said:I have a smartwatch that allows me to choose an analog-style clock face, a digital clock face, or a combination display, as I choose.
Wouldn't it be great if my ILC offered a mirror and OVF for quick response, tracking, and better battery life, but could also get the mirror out of the way to show the sensor feed for a WYSIWYG display, enhanced brightness in dim light, and information overlays? Yeah...I'd really like an ILC like that!!
neuroanatomist said:No transition needed. Think dSLR + Live View.
ahsanford said:I'm keenly interested in shooting manual lenses handheld, and I have no desire to do that with the camera held out 6-12" in front of my eye.
- A
ahsanford said:neuroanatomist said:No transition needed. Think dSLR + Live View.
The technology is largely there, yes, but a transition is still needed if you want to do this all through the viewfinder like I do. I'm keenly interested in shooting manual lenses handheld, and I have no desire to do that with the camera held out 6-12" in front of my eye.
That said, I don't need a hybrid. Pure EVF would work for me as I don't use servo or high fps shooting that often. I'm shooting One Shot almost all the time, so an EVF that can do One Shot with benefits would be attractive.
- A
slclick said:Have you used an M5? The EVF is pretty good imo. My opinion is based upon first using an Olympus Pen F which truly sucks big time...lag and jumpiness wise. Plus it was far too contrasty. If you are mainly shooting stills and non moving objects, the AF Touch and Drag setting of Absolute gives great control with AF of small areas. I prefer using the right side of the screen with my right thumb while using the EVF