C
craigkg
Guest
htjunkie said:You said it yourself: "If the next 5D were in the same $2400-2800 range, I'd likely sell the 5D2 and buy the new one. "
There you go. Canon sells up an update to your mkII, and it sells me an upgrade from my 7D. What's not to like from a sales point of view? I don't understand your logic.
The people that own 1Ds Mark III's will want to get the next generation and that leaves them with the choice of buying a $10K 645 system and new lenses or getting a 5D. The logic is, a fair number will opt to keep their lenses and buy a 5D rather than spend a fortune going the 645 route. Canon is going to want to maximize the amount of mover it can get from people that have the money for a 1Ds Mark III but don't want to buy a 645...that logically means that the next 5D will be more to milk atleast some more money out of those shooters used to paying $7000-9000 for a camera body. You have to look at this from both directions, the people moving up to a higher body and those with the higher body (1Ds3) moving laterally to the 1Ds Mark III's small format successor...which I think the next 5D will be because of the close proximity the 1Ds mark III and 5D Mark II already have. The 5D is going to complete the cannibalization and become the small format's high megapixel king.
Upvote
0