He's demonstrating resolution by tweaking the sharpness slider on 5DS and not tweaking it on 5DSr?I guess dtaylor is demonstrating resolution, not sharpness.
Upvote
0
He's demonstrating resolution by tweaking the sharpness slider on 5DS and not tweaking it on 5DSr?I guess dtaylor is demonstrating resolution, not sharpness.
I can't speak for dtaylor, but I guess he's using a tiny amount of USM to clear the slight veiling effect of the AA filter on the 5Ds which then reveals exactly the same detail resolved as on the 5Dsr. I believe that even Canon themselves never claimed that the 5Dsr resolved more detail than the 5Ds.He's demonstrating resolution by tweaking the sharpness slider on 5DS and not tweaking it on 5DSr?
I can't speak for dtaylor, but I guess he's using a tiny amount of USM to clear the slight veiling effect of the AA filter on the 5Ds which then reveals exactly the same detail resolved as on the 5Dsr.
Please read my post to which you had replied: https://www.usa.canon.com/internet/...s-and-lenses/high-resolution-eos-5ds-vs-5dsr/ where Canon claims in words and uses an image that the 5DSR shows more detail. If you argue that they didn't actually use the word "resolve" read this fromI can't speak for dtaylor, but I guess he's using a tiny amount of USM to clear the slight veiling effect of the AA filter on the 5Ds which then reveals exactly the same detail resolved as on the 5Dsr. I believe that even Canon themselves never claimed that the 5Dsr resolved more detail than the 5Ds.
GAS doesn't come into play for me at all in terms of my computer right now. I'm happy with my camera equipment. I took really good pictures with the G5X II on my recent travels. It is new enough that I haven't figured everything out, even though I had been using a G7X II for years. When I reach for me DSLR, I have no occasion to wish for a lens I don't have. When the weather is more pleasant, I plan to rent a TS lens to play with, probably the 24mm. My fear is that I will want to keep it, and send money instead of sending it back.True. Mine is 4 years old, and isn’t struggling one bit.
I’m really bad about having G.A.S. (Gear Acquisition System). And I keep looking at the new iMacs and specs then I feel silly because... well... mine is just fine. Absolutely NO way I can justify the expense.
I hope they let down the resolution. 75mpx raws will be heavy as hell and, as a wedding photographer, Im more than happy with the 30 mpx that gives the eos R actually
(I add this due I didn't explain well myself in that original message):
I didn't explain well myself on the coment. It is a good camera, of course, I like a lot all of what I'm reading here and is really appealing. I also do some architecture works and I know that those 75 mpx will be really welcome to architecture/product/fashion photographers.
All I really want is a double SD camera with equilibrated specs like eos R is, as they compare (may be I''ll have to wait until a future R mk2). But this one, is a very good option.
I really love to work with canon, and I can feel that the "perfect" our (wedding photographers) workflow is closer than I expect. This time is for landscape,product and fashion, may be the next one will be to us
Add: Is also exciting to see the way Canon is getting with the new mount and technologies, good times are coming.
My gut says 1/2*mm will be enough (absent any form of IS which would improve the situation). Anyone with a 90D or M6.2 could test this since the pixel density would be similar.
True. Mine is 4 years old, and isn’t struggling one bit.
I’m really bad about having G.A.S. (Gear Acquisition System). And I keep looking at the new iMacs and specs then I feel silly because... well... mine is just fine. Absolutely NO way I can justify the expense.
The new RF glass looks really nice, so it seems canon are on to a good thing here. My point is that I don't think canon will dominate the market as easily as they did with EF - Sony has had a good chance to establish, and they have kept releasing good lenses and new bodies themselves while canon have brought out the RF mount (I wasn't around when EF came out, but it sounds like Nikon waited for a lot longer to do anything about the market shift?)
You make my point exactly regarding the EF mount of over 30 years ago. I got beat up regularly in recent years by Nikon owners about Canon and the FD mount being abandoned. I pointed out that no one under 40-45 even knows what an FD mount is. With the Z mount Nikon finally joined the 21st century but over 30 years late. Canon with their vision created a mount good for 30 years then because it was electronic were able to make the RF mount 100% compatible with the EF mount which is great and amazing.This allows all legacy canon EF users to seamlessly transition, if desired, to the RF with no loss of lenses or features in the existing optics they own. Even Sony cannot make that claim as they moved from Minolta to all Sony. perhaps no an earthquake as the EF because the EF destroyed Nikon and now with Canon having the pro market and on top it is hard to make the same type of shift as they are there already. Their hope is to maintain dominance as they have and it looks like they will because they have the depth of lenses and services still lacking by Sony and to some extent Nikon.
One never knows though so these thoughts could be shattered tomorrow but for now I believe they are sound.
My 5K iMac is over four years old. I ordered it with the best graphics card and processor at the time, and I maxed out memory and the SSD. Nothing I’ve tried slows it down, including editing 4K video in FCP X. The only thing I wait for is when Compressor renders a batch of video.
Still "Coming this Autumn" on the UK websiteOOh....I think the new Mac Pro is supposed to be released for orders today....
Chear up! In 12 days it will be officially Winter so they will be ... liarsStill "Coming this Autumn" on the UK websitewith the option to register for a notification.
Been like this for lots of months now! Apparently having issues with getting components from China....
Maybe it will change tomorrow.
This isn't correct. The majority of IBIS systems move on a series of surface bearings which provide a fair amount of heat transfer surface. It seems like many people think that an IBIS sensor is somehow floating in space suspended by magnets or something which is not true. IBIS is really not a big deal for heat transfer, just look at how the Sony 6300, which has no IBIS, has worse overheating characteristics than the A6500, which does have IBIS.
I saw something on the interwbnet today that said if you got the absolute top of the line with everything available it would set you back around 50k(aus I think) or a bit more. and the base model(which will be good to use as a stable table is about 6kOOh....I think the new Mac Pro is supposed to be released for orders today....
75 MP needs IBIS!
They must have heard you - and/or cayenne has good sources, because sure enough the Mac Pro is finally available today (11 Dec '19) in the UK.Chear up! In 12 days it will be officially Winter so they will be ... liars
EDIT: Of course when January comes it will be a new year and "coming this Autumn" could very well mean Autumn 2020!
Just looking at my R, I don't think adding an extra card slot would make a lot of difference -- assuming it is a second SD slot.
Nice hardware this new Mac Pro. I guess it will be dirty cheap by the year 2525![]()
I saw something on the interwbnet today that said if you got the absolute top of the line with everything available it would set you back around 50k(aus I think) or a bit more. and the base model(which will be good to use as a stable table is about 6k